Evaluation of transport-related outcomes for neonatal transport teams with and without physicians

Author:

Abdelmawla Mohamed1,Hansen Gregory23,Narvey Michael14,Whyte Hilary56,Ilodigwe Don5,Lee Kyong-Soon56,Singh Avash,Ting Joseph,Tierney Anne,Thomas Sumesh,Phillips Ernesto,Byrne Paul,Toye Jennifer,Bingham William,Daspal Sibasis,Kalapesi Zarin,Murthy Poornima,Caces Rebecca,Roukema Henry,Marrin Michael,Redpath Stephanie,Beaumier Louis,Perrault Thérèse,Piuze Geneviève,Massé Edith,Jangaard Krista,Deshpandey Akhil,

Affiliation:

1. Division of Neonatology, Children’s Hospital of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

2. Division of Critical Care, Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

3. Department of Pediatrics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

4. Department of Pediatrics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

5. Division of Neonatology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

6. Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate if the presence of a physician in the neonatal transport team (NTT) affects transport-related outcomes and procedural success. Design Retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching. Setting Canadian national study. Patients Neonatal transports from nontertiary centres between January 2014 and December 2017. Interventions Comparison of transports conducted by NTTs with physicians (MD Group) and without physicians (noMD Group). Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the change in patient acuity as measured by the transport risk index of physiologic severity (TRIPS) score. Secondary outcomes included mortality within 24 hours of NICU admission, clinical complications during transport, procedural success, and stabilization time. Results Among 9,703 eligible cases, 899 neonatal transports attended by NTTs with physicians were compared to 899 neonatal transports without physicians using propensity score matching. No differences were seen in the improvement of TRIPS score or mortality ≤24 hours of NICU admission. The MD Group had more clinical complications (7.7% versus 5.0%, P=0.02). No differences were seen in success rates of invasive procedures. The MD Group had shorter stabilization times. In multivariable analysis, the MD Group was not a significant predictor for the improvement in TRIPS score after adjustment for covariates. Conclusions Neonatal transports conducted by teams including physicians compared to teams without physicians, did not have higher improvement in TRIPS scores and had similar success rates for procedures. These results provide insights for the planning of the structure and training of specialized interfacility neonatal transport programs.

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference26 articles.

1. National survey of neonatal transport teams in the United States;Karlsen;Pediatrics,2011

2. Variations in transport outcomes of outborn infants among Canadian neonatal intensive care units;Eliason;Am J Perinatol,2013

3. The state of neonatal transport services in the UK;Fenton;Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed,2012

4. Nurse only retrieval: ACT Neonatal Emergency Transport Team;Watson;J Paediatr Child Health,2017

5. Neonatal transport: A controlled study of skilled assistance. Mortality and morbidity of neonates less than 1.5 kg birth weight;Chance;J Pediatr,1978

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3