Affiliation:
1. Católica Lisbon School of Business and Economics
2. NYU Stern School of Business
3. University of Zurich
4. Swiss Finance Institute, KU Leuven and CEPR
Abstract
Abstract
We study local loan conditions when banks close branches. In places where branch closures do not take place, firms that purposely switch banks receive a sixty-three basis points (bps) discount. However, after the closure of nearby branches of their credit-granting banks, firms that locally and hurriedly transfer to other banks receive no such discount. Yet, the loan default rate for the latter (more expensive) transfer loans is on average a full percentage point lower than that for the former (cheaper) switching loans. This suggests that transfer firms are of “better” quality than switching firms. In sum, even if local markets remain competitive, when banks close branches, firms lose.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Finance,Economics and Econometrics,Accounting
Reference85 articles.
1. Distance and private information in lending;Agarwal;Review of Financial Studies,2010
2. Consumer bankruptcy, bank mergers, and information;Allen;Review of Finance,2016
3. Mostly Harmless Econometrics
4. Firm default probabilities revisited;Antunes;Banco de Portugal Economic Studies,2016
5. Switching costs in local credit markets;Barone;International Journal of Industrial Organization,2011
Cited by
44 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献