A Framework for Understanding Consumer Choices for Others

Author:

Liu Peggy J1,Dallas Steven K2,Fitzsimons Gavan J3

Affiliation:

1. Marketing and Business Economics Area, Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, 3950 Roberto Clemente Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15260

2. Duke University School of Law, 210 Science Drive, Durham, NC 27708, and a visiting scholar, Marketing Department, Stern School of Business, New York University, 40 West 4th Street, New York, NY 10012

3. Edward S. & Rose K. Donnell Professor of Marketing and Psychology, Marketing Department, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, 100 Fuqua Drive, Durham, NC 27708

Abstract

Abstract Although most research on consumers’ choices, and resulting insights, have focused on choices that consumers make solely for themselves, consumers often make choices for others, and there is a growing literature examining such choices. Theoretically, how can this growing literature be integrated, and what gaps remain? Practically, why should marketers, consumers, and policy makers care when choices are made for others, and what should they do differently? A 2 × 2 framework of consumers’ choices for others addresses these questions. This framework has two fundamental dimensions: the chooser’s social focus (relationship vs. recipient oriented) and the chooser’s consideration of consumption preferences (highlight the recipient’s preferences vs. balance the recipient’s preferences with the chooser’s preferences). These dimensions generate four cells that represent prototypical choosing-for-others contexts: gift-giving (relationship focus, highlighting recipient’s preferences), joint consumption (relationship focus, balancing recipient’s and chooser’s preferences), everyday favors/pick-ups (recipient focus, highlighting recipient’s preferences), and caregiving (recipient focus, balancing recipient’s and chooser’s preferences). This framework captures most choosing-for-others situations, and each cell involves a distinct profile of motives, ultimately affecting choices. This framework integrates the choosing-for-others literature, which we hope will guide future research, and it also offers practical implications for marketers, consumers, and policy makers.

Funder

Duke UC Lab Group

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Marketing,Economics and Econometrics,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Anthropology,Business and International Management

Reference135 articles.

1. Infant–Mother Attachment;Ainsworth;American Psychologist,1979

2. Dimensions of Consumer Expertise;Alba;Journal of Consumer Research,1987

3. Patient Preferences for Medical Decision Making: Who Really Wants to Participate?;Arora;Medical Care,2000

4. Building Understanding of the Domain of Consumer Vulnerability;Baker;Journal of Macromarketing,2005

5. The Role of (Dis) Similarity in (Mis) Predicting Others’ Preferences;Barasz;Journal of Marketing Research,2016

Cited by 92 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3