Directly Mailing gFOBT Kits to Previous Responders Being Recalled for Colorectal Cancer Screening Increases Participation

Author:

Tinmouth Jill1234ORCID,Patel Jigisha1,Austin Peter C23,Baxter Nancy N235,Brouwers Melissa C6,Earle Craig C3,Levitt Cheryl7,Lu Yan8,MacKinnon Marnie4,Paszat Lawrence1239,Rabeneck Linda234910

Affiliation:

1. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

2. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

3. Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

4. Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

5. Department of Surgery and Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

6. Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

7. Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

8. Critical Care Services Ontario, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

9. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

10. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

Abstract Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) reduces CRC-related death. Average risk individuals should be recalled for screening with gFOBT every 2 years in order to maximize effectiveness. However, adherence with repeated testing is often suboptimal. Our aim was to evaluate whether adding a gFOBT kit to a mailed recall letter improves participation compared with a mailed recall letter alone, among previous responders to a mailed invitation. Methods We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial, with the primary care provider as the unit of randomization. Eligible patients had completed a gFOBT and tested negative in an earlier pilot study and were now due for recall. The intervention group received a mailed CRC screening recall letter from their primary care provider plus a gFOBT kit (n = 431) while the control group received a mailed CRC screening mailed recall letter alone (n = 452). The primary outcome was the uptake of gFOBT or colonoscopy within 6 months. Results gFOBT uptake was higher in the intervention group (61.3%, n = 264) compared with the control group (50.4%, n = 228) with an absolute difference between the two groups of 10.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4 to 20.2%, P = <0.01). Patients in the intervention group were more likely to complete the gFOBT compared with the control group (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1 to 1.9). Conclusion Our findings show that adding gFOBT kits to the mailed recall letter increased participation among persons recalled for screening. Nine gFOBT kits would have to be sent by mail in order to screen one additional person.

Funder

Ontario Institute for Cancer Research

Government of Ontario

Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences

Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

Cancer Care Ontario

Heart and Stroke Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3