Clinical Trials Radiographers identifying priority challenges associated with implementing a national programme of clinical trials in the United Kingdom’s first proton beam therapy centre

Author:

Davies Lucy S C1ORCID,McHugh Louise1,Falk Sally2,Bridge Jacqui1,Amaro Philip F1,Whiteside Lee1ORCID,Bailey Rachael1,Webb Julie1,Eccles Cynthia L13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiotherapy, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust , Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom

2. Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust , Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom

3. Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre , Manchester M13 9NT, United Kingdom

Abstract

Abstract Objectives This article is an evaluation of the current trial processes within a national proton beam therapy (PBT) clinical trial service in the United Kingdom. The work within the article identifies priority challenges associated with the implementation of PBT trials with a view to improving patient trial processes. Methods The nominal group technique (NGT) was used. Five Clinical Trials Radiographers were asked the target question “what are the major challenges when implementing PBT clinical trials and facilitating PBT trial-related activities?” Participants individually and silently listed their challenges to the target question. Following this, group discussion clarified and refined responses. Participants then individually selected five challenges that they deemed most pertinent to the target question, giving a weighted score (out of 10). Individual scores were combined to provide a ranked, weighted order of challenges. Further group discussion identified improvement strategies to the highest scored challenges. Results After combining lists generated by participants, 59 challenges were identified. Group discussion eliminated 27 responses. Eighteen were merged, resulting in 14 challenges. The two challenges that ranked highest were: (i) lack of initial understanding of the responsibilities of teams and who the relevant stakeholders were, and (ii) that a national PBT service requires the provision of shared care across multi-disciplinary teams and sites. Improvement areas include the development of shared protocols, clarifying stakeholder responsibilities and improving communication between centres to streamline PBT trial processes. Conclusions This work has identified priority areas requiring development to improve the conduct of a national PBT clinical trials programme. Advances in knowledge This is the first publication to evaluate current clinical trial processes for the United Kingdom’s PBT service.

Funder

NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference15 articles.

1. Proton beam therapy: perspectives on the National Health Service England clinical service and research programme;Burnet;Br J Radiol,2020

2. The nominal group technique: a useful consensus methodology in physiotherapy research;Potter;N Z J Physiother.,2004

3. Delphi methodology in healthcare research: how to decide its appropriateness;Nasa;World J Methodol,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3