Screening and Enrollment by Sex in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Clinical Trials in the United States

Author:

Smeaton Laura M1ORCID,Kacanek Deborah1,Mykhalchenko Kateryna2,Coughlin Kristine3,Klingman Karin L4,Koletar Susan L5,Barr Elizabeth6,Collier Ann C7

Affiliation:

1. Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

2. Department of Family Medicine, BronxCare Health, Bronx, New York, USA

3. Frontier Science and Technology Research Foundation, Inc, Amherst, New York, USA

4. Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

5. Division of Infectious Diseases, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA

6. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Community Scientific Subcommittee, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

7. Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundWomen are underrepresented in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) research in the United States. To determine if women screening for HIV clinical trials enrolled at lower rates than men, we performed a retrospective, cross-trial analysis.MethodsWe conducted an analysis of screening and enrollment during 2003–2013 to 31 clinical trials at 99 AIDS Clinical Trials Group network research sites in the United States. Random-effects meta regression estimated whether sex differences in not enrolling (“screen out”) varied by various individual, trial, or site characteristics.ResultsOf 10 744 persons screened, 18.9% were women. The percentages of women and men who screened out were 27.9% and 26.5%, respectively (P = .19); this small difference did not significantly vary by race, ethnicity, or age group. Most common reasons for screening out were not meeting eligibility criteria (30–35%) and opting out (23%), and these did not differ by sex. Trial and research site characteristics associated with variable screen-out by sex included HIV research domain and type of hemoglobin eligibility criterion, but individual associations did not persist after adjustment for multiple testing.ConclusionsIn the absence of evidence of significantly higher trial screen-out for women, approaching more women to screen may increase female representation in HIV trials.

Funder

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3