The State of the Discipline: How Far Along Are We in Developing an IR Theory Based on Southeast Asia’s Experiences

Author:

na Thalang Chanintira1ORCID,Chong Ja Ian2,Do Thuy Thi3ORCID,Kraft Herman Joseph S4,Kuik Cheng-Chwee5ORCID,Wicaksana I Gede Wahyu6,Chheang Vannarith7,Santoso Yohanes William8ORCID,Benny Guido9

Affiliation:

1. Thammasat University , Thailand

2. National University of Singapore , Singapore

3. Diplomatic Academy of Vietnam , Vietnam

4. University of the Philippines , The Philippines

5. Institute of Malaysian and International Studies, National University of Malaysia , Malaysia

6. Universitas Airlangga Surabaya , Indonesia

7. Asian Vision Institute , Cambodia

8. Universitas Amikom , Indonesia

9. Bina Nusantara University , Indonesia

Abstract

Abstract Based on reflexive stocktaking and data collected from a cross-country survey distributed in seven Southeast Asian academic communities, namely Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, the Philippines, and Vietnam, this article explores how much progress Southeast Asian international relations (IR) academic communities have made in advancing a theory or concept based on local experiences. It is argued that while mainstream IR remains dominant, debates since the early 2000s have introduced new concepts. At the same time, new theoretical proposals are rare due to the vast diversity in Southeast Asia and a general interest in producing policy- and empirical-oriented work. Nevertheless, there are opportunities for constructing a Southeast Asian theory based on the region’s distinct perspectives on international relations shaped by ASEAN norms and institutions and the complex interactions between politics at the domestic and international levels. Any new conceptual or theoretical framework must also provide useful implications beyond the region.

Funder

Faculty of Political Science, Thammasat University

Korea Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference109 articles.

1. Whose Ideas Matter?

2. The Making of Southeast Asia

3. The Myth of ASEAN Centrality?;Acharya;Contemporary Southeast Asia,2017

4. Towards a Global International Relations?;Acharya,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3