Understanding the use of heart failure online health forums: a qualitative study

Author:

Farnood Annabel1,Johnston Bridget12,Mair Frances S3

Affiliation:

1. Nursing and Healthcare, School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

2. NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, UK

3. General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

Abstract

Abstract Aims Heart failure is a major public health challenge and is described as an epidemic. Many people resort to the internet as a source of health information and online health forums have become an increasingly common way to obtain information and support regarding health-related issues. This study aims to explore what information people concerned about heart failure seek from online health forums, and how this shapes decision-making, trust, and interactions with healthcare professionals. Methods and results Widely available internet search engines (Google, Yahoo, and Bing) were used to identify online health forums, accessed by people seeking information on heart failure. Comments posted between 2016 and 2019 were screened, downloaded, and analysed thematically. Normalization Process Theory provided the underlying conceptual lens to inform analysis. Ten online health forums were identified, and 204 individual posts analysed. Three themes were identified [(information and support needs; online diagnosis; and relationship with healthcare professionals (HCPs)]. The most common purpose for using online health forums was to plug information/knowledge gaps surrounding diagnosis or treatments (e.g. discussion of results, medication/health insurance queries). They were used as a tool to aid decision-making regarding, (i) whether to seek further medical attention and (ii) lifestyle choices, medications, and other advice surrounding concerns. Negative experiences with HCPs were discussed, and sometimes online health forums appeared to promote distrust with HCPs. Conclusion Online health forums offer a supportive platform and help fill key informational gaps. However, online forums may amplify distrust with HCPs.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Advanced and Specialised Nursing,Medical–Surgical,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3