Patients’ openness to discussing implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation at end of life: a cross-sectional study

Author:

Lee Kyoung Suk1,Oh Oonjee1ORCID,Miller Jennifer2,Hammash Muna3,Thompson David R4,Ski Chantal F5,Cameron Jan6ORCID,Hwang Seon Young7,Moser Debra K2

Affiliation:

1. College of Nursing, Seoul National University, 103 Daehak-ro, Jong-ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea

2. College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, 751 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536, USA

3. School of Nursing, University of Louisville, 555 S Floyd St, Louisville, KY 40202, USA

4. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University Belfast 97 Lisburn Rd, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK

5. Integrated Care Academy, University of Suffolk, 19 Neptune Quay, Ipswich IP4 1QJ, UK

6. School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, 27-31 Wright Street, Clayton VIC 3168, Australia

7. College of Nursing, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, South Korea

Abstract

Abstract Aims It is recommended that patients and clinicians discuss end-of-life deactivation of their implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) prior to device implantation and throughout the illness trajectory to facilitate shared decision-making. However, such discussions rarely occur, and little is known about patients’ openness to this discussion. The purpose of this study was to explore factors associated with patients’ openness to discussing end-of-life ICD deactivation with clinicians. Methods and results This cross-sectional study recruited 293 patients with an ICD from outpatient clinics in the USA, Australia, and South Korea. Patients were classified into an open or resistant group based on their desire to discuss device deactivation at end of life with clinicians. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore factors related to patients’ openness to this discussion. About half of the participants (57.7%) were open to discussing such issues with their clinicians. Factors related to patients’ openness to discussing device deactivation at end of life were living with someone, not having severe comorbid conditions (cancer and/or chronic kidney disease), greater ICD knowledge, and more experience discussing end-of-life issues with clinicians (odds ratio: 0.479, 0.382, 1.172, 1.332, respectively). Conclusion Approximately half of the ICD recipients were reluctant to discuss device deactivation at end of life with clinicians. Unmodifiable factors were their living arrangement and severe comorbidity. ICD knowledge and prior experience discussing end-of-life issues were potentially modifiable factors in the future. These factors should be addressed when assessing patients’ readiness for a shared discussion about device deactivation at end of life.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Medical–Surgical Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference48 articles.

1. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: The Task Force for the Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC);Priori;Europace,2015

2. Implantation trends and patient profiles for pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators in the United States: 1993–2006;Kurtz;Pacing Clin Electrophysiol,2010

3. Current use of implantable electrical devices in Sweden: data from the Swedish pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator registry;Gadler;Europace,2015

4. Thirteen-year nationwide trends in use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and subsequent long-term survival;Schmidt;Heart Rhythm,2015

5. Patient perceptions of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator deactivation discussions: a qualitative study;MacIver;SAGE Open Med,2016

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3