Justification, rationale and methodological approaches to realist reviews

Author:

Pearsons Alice1ORCID,Neubeck Lis12ORCID,Hendriks Jeroen M34ORCID,Hanson Coral L1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Edinburgh Napier University, School of Health and Social Care , Sighthill Campus, Sighthill Court, Edinburgh EH11 4BN , UK

2. Sydney Nursing School, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney , Johns Hopkins Road, Sydney, NSW 2006 , Australia

3. Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital , Port Road, Adelaide SA 5000 , Australia

4. Flinders University, Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences , Sturt Road, Bedford Park, SA 5001 , Australia

Abstract

Abstract Realist reviews offer a method to understand why an intervention is successful or not. Many factors influence how complex healthcare interventions are delivered and this makes understanding what works difficult. Effectiveness depends on delivery context, and success in one setting does not guarantee the same result in alternate settings. How an intervention works (the underlying mechanisms) in a particular setting for one population group, may not work in the same way for a different group. A realist review provides an iterative theory-driven approach to help understand how and for whom and under what conditions an intervention works.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Medical–Surgical Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference19 articles.

1. New evidence pyramid;Murad;Evid Based Med,2016

2. Decision aids for shared decision-making and appropriate anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Song;EJCN,2022

3. Building realist program theory for large complex and messy interventions;Shearn;Int J Qual Methods,2017

4. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of medical research council guidance;Skivington;BMJ,2021

5. Realist review—a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions;Pawson;J Health Serv Res Policy,2005

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3