Are digital citizen panels an innovative, deliberative approach to cardiovascular research?

Author:

Siira Elin1ORCID,Wolf Axel1234

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Arvid Wallgrens Backe Building 4, 413 46 Göteborg, Sweden

2. University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care, University of Gothenburg, Arvid Wallgrens Backe Building 4, 413 46 Göteborg, Sweden

3. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Diagnosvägen 11, 416 85 Göteborg, Sweden

4. Institute of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Postboks 4, St. Olavs plass 0130 Oslo, Norway

Abstract

Abstract Online citizen panels are an innovative way to collect information about populations. They can help explain social determinants of health while involving citizens in research, allowing researchers to help the community, and advance cardiovascular research. This paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of collecting information via online citizen panels and assesses these panels’ potential in cardiovascular research. To exemplify such panels’ use, we discuss a case study that utilized the Swedish Citizen Panel.

Funder

University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), Sweden

Swedish Government’s grant for Strategic Research Areas (Care Sciences) and the University of Gothenburg, Sweden

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Medical–Surgical Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference41 articles.

1. Patienthood and participation in the digital era;Erikainen;Digit Health,2019

2. Strengthening the learning health system in cardiovascular disease prevention: time to leverage big data and digital solutions;Wagle;Curr Atheroscler Rep,2021

3. Learning from Gothenburg model of person centred healthcare;Britten;BMJ,2020

4. Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives;Boivin;Qual Saf Health Care,2010

5. Public participation in health care priority setting: a scoping review;Mitton;Health Policy,2009

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3