Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on the use of PCSK9 inhibitors in cardiovascular disease: an in-depth qualitative study

Author:

Lee Geraldine A1ORCID,Durante Angela2ORCID,Baker Edward E3ORCID,Vellone Ercole45ORCID,Caggianelli Gabriele6ORCID,Dellafiore Federica7,Khan Mutiba89ORCID,Khatib Rani810ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Catherine McAuley School of Nursing & Midwifery, University College Cork , Brookfield Health Sciences Complex, College Road, Cork T12 AK54 , Ireland

2. Translational Medicine Department, University of Eastern Piedmont ‘Amedeo Avogadro’ , Piedmont , Italy

3. Emergency Department, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK

4. Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University of Rome , Rome , Italy

5. Department of Nursing and Obstetrics, Wroclaw Medical University , Wroclaw , Poland

6. Cardiovascular Department, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital , Rome , Italy

7. Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Section of Hygiene, University of Pavia , Pavia , Italy

8. Cardiology Department, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust , Leeds , UK

9. Medicines Management and Pharmacy Services, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust , Leeds , UK

10. Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (LICAMM), University of Leeds , Leeds , UK

Abstract

Abstract Aims Injectable medicines such as PCSK9 inhibitors are increasingly used to manage risk factors for cardiovascular events with little information around the perceptions of healthcare professionals (HCPs) on the administrative and clinical practicalities. The aim was to identify the facilitators and barriers on the use of injectable therapies with cardiovascular benefits through interviews with HCPs. Methods and results Qualitative interviews were conducted in the UK (London and Leeds) and Italy (Rome and Milan) in 2021. Coding was undertaken using NVivo and thematic analysis performed. A total of 38 HCPs were interviewed, 19 in each country composing of physicians (n = 18), pharmacists (n = 10), nurses (n = 9), and pharmacy technician (n = 1). Four themes emerged: (i) clinicians’ previous experiences with injectable therapies, (ii) challenges with patients’ behaviours and beliefs, (iii) clinicians’ knowledge of injectable therapies and therapeutic inertia, and (iv) organizational and governance issues. The behaviour and beliefs from HCPs focused on facilitating behaviour change as well as the poor interdisciplinary working and collaboration. Therapeutic inertia was raised where physicians either lacked awareness of injectable therapies or were unwilling to prescribe them. The importance of facilitating patient education on injection techniques was highlighted, while organizational and governance issues identified the lack of guidance to inform practice. Clear pathways are required to identify those who were eligible for injectable therapies as well as on how injectables should be prescribed. Conclusion If medicine optimization is to be achieved, there need to be structured processes in place to identify eligible patients and the development of educational material.

Funder

European Society of Cardiology

(ESC)

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3