Usability of a digital health platform to support home hospitalization in heart failure patients: a multicentre feasibility study among healthcare professionals

Author:

Leenen Jobbe P L12ORCID,Scherrenberg Martijn345ORCID,Bruins Wendy6ORCID,Boyne Josiane7ORCID,Vranken Julie45ORCID,Brunner la Rocca Hans-Peter7ORCID,Dendale Paul345ORCID,van der Velde Astrid E6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Connected Care Centre, Isala Hospital , Dr. van Heesweg 2, Zwolle, AB 8025 , The Netherlands

2. Isala Academy, Isala   Hospital, Dr. van Heesweg 2, Zwolle, AB 8025 , The Netherlands

3. Heart Centre Hasselt, Jessa Hospital , Salvatorstraat 20, Hasselt 3500 , Belgium

4. Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, UHasselt , Martelarenlaan 42, Hasselt 3500 , Belgium

5. Mobile Health Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University , Martelarenlaan 42, Hasselt 3500 , Belgium

6. Isala Heart Centre, Isala   Hospital, Dr. van Heesweg 2, Zwolle, AB 8025 , The Netherlands

7. Cardiology Department, Maastricht University Medical Centre , Minderbroedersberg 4-6, Maastricht, 6211 LK , The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Aims Heart failure (HF) is a common cause of mortality and (re)hospitalizations. The NWE-Chance project explored the feasibility of providing hospitalizations at home (HH) supported by a newly developed digital health platform. The aim of this study was to explore the perceived usability by healthcare professionals (HCPs) of a digital platform in addition to HH for HF patients. Methods and results A prospective, international, multicentre, single-arm interventional study was conducted. Sixty-three patients and 22 HCPs participated. The HH consisted of daily home visits by the nurse and use of the platform, consisting of a portable blood pressure device, weight scale, pulse oximeter, a wearable chest patch to measure vital signs (heart rate, respiratory rate, activity level, and posture), and an eCoach for the patient. Primary outcome was usability of the platform measured by the System Usability Scale halfway and at the end of the study. Overall usability was rated as sufficient (mean score 72.1 ± 8.9) and did not differ between the measurements moments (P = 0.690). The HCPs reported positive experiences (n = 7), negative experiences (n = 13), and recommendations (n = 6) for the future. Actual use of the platform was 79% of the HH days. Conclusion A digital health platform to support HH was considered usable by HCPs, although actual use of the platform was limited. Therefore, several improvements in the integration of the digital platform into clinical workflows and in defining the precise role of the digital platform and its use are needed to add value before full implementation. Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04084964.

Funder

Interreg

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Medical–Surgical Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3