Ambulatory prostanoid therapy: safe reduction in duration of inpatient training

Abstract

Abstract Aims IV prostanoid therapy for advanced pulmonary arterial hypertension requires lifelong, continuous infusion, and extensive self-care. The inpatient training pathway (ITP) ensures patient competency but can be psychologically and physically demanding. Therefore, an alternative Elective Prostanoid Admission Pathway (EPAP) was developed. Compare clinical outcomes and patient experiences for patients following the EPAP vs. the ITP. Methods and results From 2013, clinically stable patients were trained via the EPAP, which consisted of pre-admission including an outpatient training day, followed by inpatient training. The EPAP patients were followed-up face-to-face/via telephone and could access a Clinical Nurse Specialist-led telephone service between appointments. Very high-risk patients were trained via the ITP, which consisted of pre-therapy counselling and daily ward-based training. Prior to 2013, patients followed the ITP pathway irrespective of clinical status. All were enrolled into the ‘IV buddy’ scheme and retrospectively asked to complete patient experience surveys. Among EPAP (n = 24) and ITP (n = 54) patients, 17% and 33% discontinued therapy, respectively. Among all, frequent challenges to treatment initiation were: dexterity (43%) and body image (27%). Elective Prostanoid Admission Pathway use reduced inpatient stay duration by 8 days per patient and infection rates remained low. Patient experience surveys [n = 17 (EPAP), n = 10 (ITP)] showed equal patient satisfaction between groups, but the incidence of side effects was numerically lower in EPAP patients, who also reported home practice and having access to the ‘IV buddy’ scheme as ‘very useful’ [12/14 (86%) and 10/13 (77%), respectively]. Conclusions Elective Prostanoid Admission Pathway implementation improved patient outcomes and has the potential for application to other clinical scenarios where patient self-management is required.