745 Evaluating Nurses' Perceptions of Code Cart Competency

Author:

Folliard Sarah A1,Grubbs Alicia K1,Beyene Robel1,Doyle Kelly1,Gondek Stephen1,Young Miranda1

Affiliation:

1. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Mount Juliet, Tennessee; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Hendersonville, Tennessee; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Vanderbilt, Spring hill, Tennessee

Abstract

Abstract Introduction This study was conducted to evaluate critical care nurses' perceptions of competency when using the code cart during Advance Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) resuscitation. During post-resuscitation debrief, it was noted that nurses reported lack of familiarity with using the code cart and could not quickly locate items when needed. Methods Using an email distribution list sent to nurses employed in the Burn Center, a pre-survey was conducted to evaluate baseline competency levels and provide the opportunity to self report level of familiarity with the code cart and the roles needed to conduct effective ACLS resuscitation. Following the pre-survey, various educational opportunities were offered to the nursing staff including written and hands-on activities in a low-stress setting. These activities were offered to day and night shift nurses on several occasions, and there was no limit to how many times a nurse could participate. Following 3 months of targeted educational intervention, a post-survey was conducted to re-evaluate the nurses' perceived comfort level with using the code cart during ACLS resuscitation. Results The average years of nursing experience among participants was 3-4, with only two participants reporting 5 or more years of critical care experience. The nurses reported an increase in self-reported confidence level with using the code cart. The most common educational intervention that nurses felt would increase their comfort levels with using the crash cart were more frequent simulation scenarios (ie: mock codes), and hands-on training with open crash carts during in a low stress setting. Conclusions Because ACLS resuscitation is a stressful, chaotic event, it is not feasible for nurses to learn "in the moment." Critical care nurses in the Burn Center are trained on resuscitation and are required to maintain ACLS certification, but this is not enough training for them to feel comfortable with their responsibilities during a code. After identifying that nurses were not confident in being able to work the crash cart and could not find necessary items when asked to do so during an emergency, a plan for additional hands-on education in a low-stress setting was developed. Using a pre/post survey, the multi-faceted educational opportunities were evaluated to see if they would impact the nurses' self-reported perceptions of code cart competency. Results indicated that not only were the educational interventions successful, but the nurses would like further opportunities for ongoing participation to maintain their level of comfort with the crash cart.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Rehabilitation,Emergency Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Migrating Mobile Applications to the Web;CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing;2024-07-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3