Updating the Burn Center Referral Criteria: Results From the 2018 eDelphi Consensus Study

Author:

Bettencourt Amanda P1ORCID,Romanowski Kathleen S2,Joe Victor3,Jeng James4,Carter Jeffrey E5,Cartotto Robert6,Craig Christopher K7,Fabia Renata8,Vercruysse Gary A9,Hickerson William L10,Liu Yuk11,Ryan Colleen M1213,Schulz John T1114

Affiliation:

1. Department of Systems, Populations, and Leadership, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor

2. Shriners Hospitals for Children Northern California, University of California, Davis, Sacramento

3. UC Irvine Health Regional Burn Center, Division of Trauma, Burns, Critical Care, and Acute Care Surgery, Irvine, California

4. Crozer-Chester Medical Center, Upland, Pennsylvania

5. UMC Burn Center, New Orleans, Louisiana

6. Ross Tilley Burn Center, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada

7. Wake Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

8. Division of Pediatric Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Nationwide Children Hospital, Columbus

9. University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor

10. Firefighters Burn Center, University of Tennessee, Memphis

11. Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois

12. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

13. Shriners Hospitals for Children-Boston®, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston

14. Sumner Redstone Burn Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston

Abstract

Abstract Existing burn center referral criteria were developed several years ago, and subsequent innovations in burn care have occurred. Coupled with frequent errors in the estimation of extent of burn injury and depth by referring providers, patients are both over and under-triaged when the existing criteria are used to support patient care decisions. In the absence of compelling clinical trial data on appropriate burn patient triage, we convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to execute an iterative eDelphi consensus process to facilitate a revision. The eDelphi process panel consisted of n = 61 burn stakeholders and experts and progressed through four rounds before reaching consensus on key clinical domains. The major findings are that 1) burn center consultation is strongly recommended for all patients with deep partial-thickness or deeper burns ≥ 10% TBSA burned, for full-thickness burns ≥ 5% TBSA burned, for children and older adults with specific dressing and medical needs, and for special burn circumstances including electrical, chemical, and radiation injuries; 2) smaller burns are ideally followed in burn center outpatient settings as soon as possible after injury, preferably without delays of a week or more; 3) frostbite, Stevens–Johnson syndrome/TENS, and necrotizing soft-tissue infection patients benefit from burn center treatment; and 4) telemedicine and technological solutions are of likely benefit in achieving this standard. Unlike the original criteria, the revised consensus-based guidelines create a framework promoting communication so that triage and treatment are specifically tailored to individual patient characteristics, injury severity, geography, and the capabilities of referring institutions.

Funder

National Institute of Nursing Research

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

National Institutes of Health

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Rehabilitation,Emergency Medicine,Surgery

Reference21 articles.

1. Burn center referral criteria from guidelines for the operation of burn centers;American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma,2006

2. Expert outpatient burn care in the home through mobile health technology;Garcia;J Burn Care Res,2018

3. Telemedicine evaluation of acute burns is accurate and cost-effective;Saffle;J Trauma,2009

4. Evaluation of burn rounds using telemedicine: perspectives from patients, families, and burn center staff;Yenikomshian;Telemedicine and E-Health,2019

5. Inter-facility transfer of pediatric burn patients from U.S. Emergency Departments;Johnson;Burns,2016

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3