Five-Year Retrospective Analysis of a Vented Mobility Algorithm in the Burn ICU

Author:

O’Neil Audrey M1,Rush Cassandra1,Griffard Laura1,Roggy David1,Boyd Allison1,Hartman Brett C2

Affiliation:

1. Richard M. Fairbanks Burn Center , Indianapolis, Indiana , USA

2. Indiana University School of Medicine , Indianapolis, Indiana , USA

Abstract

Abstract Early mobilization with mechanically ventilated patients has received significant attention within recent literature; however, limited research has focused specifically on the burn population. The purpose of this single-center, retrospective analysis was to review the use of a burn critical care mobility algorithm, to determine the safety and feasibility of a burn vented mobility program, share limitations preventing mobility progression at our facility, and discuss unique challenges to vented mobility with intubated burn patients. A retrospective review was completed for all intubated burn center admissions between January 2015 and December 2019. Burn therapy notes were then reviewed for data collection, during the intubation period, using stages of the mobility algorithm. In the 5-year period following initial implementation, the vented mobility algorithm was utilized on 127 patients with an average TBSA of 22.8%. No adverse events occurred. Stage 1 (range of motion) was completed with 100% of patients (n = 127). Chair mode of bed, stage 2a, was utilized in 39.4% (n = 50) of patients, while 15.8% (n = 20) of patients were dependently transferred to the cardiac chair in stage 2b. Stage 3 (sitting on the edge of the bed) was completed with 25% (n = 32) of patients, with 11% (n = 14) progressing to stage 5 (standing), and 3.9% (n = 5) actively transferring to a chair. In the 5 years, only 4.7% (n = 6) reached stage 6 (ambulation). The most common treatment limitations were medical complications (33%) and line placement (21%). Early mobilization during mechanical ventilation is safe and feasible within the burn population, despite challenges, including airway stability, sedation, and line limitations.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Rehabilitation,Emergency Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3