The Short- and Long-Term Outcome Priorities of a Western Australian Adult Burn Population

Author:

Spronk Inge123ORCID,Wood Fiona M456ORCID,Fear Mark W56ORCID,Lansdorp Corine A7,Edgar Dale W45689

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam , Rotterdam, 3000CA , The Netherlands

2. Association of Dutch Burn Centres, Maasstad Hospital , Rotterdam, 3007AC , The Netherlands

3. Dutch Burns Foundation , Beverwijk, 1941AJ , The Netherlands

4. State Adult Burn Unit, Fiona Stanley Hospital, South Metropolitan Health Service , Murdoch, WA 6150 , Australia

5. Burn Injury Research Unit, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Western Australia , Crawley, WA 6009 , Australia

6. Fiona Wood Foundation , Murdoch, WA 6150 , Australia

7. Department Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam , Amsterdam, 1007MB , The Netherlands

8. Institute for Health Research, Burn Injury Research Node, The University of Notre Dame Australia , Fremantle, WA 6959 , Australia

9. Safety and Quality Unit, Armadale Kalamunda Group Health Service, East Metropolitan Health Service , Mt Nasura, WA 6992 , Australia

Abstract

Abstract To optimize patient recovery, understanding which outcomes are most important to burn patients is key. However, research to determine what outcomes are patient priorities is limited. Therefore, we assessed what outcomes are most important to Western Australian burn patients, separately in the short-term (<6 months) and long-term (6-24 months) after injury. Adult patients who had a burn injury 3-36 months ago completed a survey, rating the importance of 36 short- and long-term outcomes. The survey items were ranked according to the number of patients reporting the outcome as “very important.” Results were compared between subgroups based on age, gender, burn size, and number of surgeries. Ninety-three patients were included. In the short-term, “not having a wound infection” (87.1%), “good wound healing” (83.9%), and “walking or moving around” (74.7%) were the most important outcomes. “Lifting or moving something” (67.6%), “walking or moving around” (66.2%), and “being independent” (66.2%) were reported as most important in the long-term. Scar-related outcomes were more important to females and to patients with multiple surgeries; mental health outcomes were priorities for females and patients with major burns; walking and moving around to males and older patients; and social and financial outcomes were rated highly by patients with major burns and multiple surgeries. In conclusion, the most important outcomes were consistent across time periods, indicating the importance of core outcomes in longitudinal follow-up. The wide range of priority outcomes and differences between subgroups underlines the need for multidisciplinary care and a patient-centered approach to support patients.

Funder

Dutch Burns Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Rehabilitation,Emergency Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3