Affiliation:
1. Institut d'Analisi Economica (CSIC), Spain
2. University of Lausanne & CEPR, Switzerland
3. Stockholm University, Sweden
Abstract
Abstract
Spatial analyses focus to a large extent on the ‘bright side of proximity’, namely voluntary (positive-sum) interactions such as, e.g., in trade and innovation. In contrast, the violent ‘dark side of proximity’ has often been overlooked. To address this gap, we study the role of spatial proximity in ethnic conflict, developing a structural model of spatial violence in which ethnic groups recruit fighters strategically across space. The spatial decay of violence determines the equilibrium placement of fighters and drives specific spatial patterns of conflict. The structural parameters of the model are estimated using fine-grained data on ethnic groups and violence from twenty-four ethnically divided countries. We find that in more than half of these, spatial decay is substantial: half of all ethnic violence dissipates after 350 km. Violence is asymmetric, is higher near ethnic borders and typically originates from outside a location. Counterfactual estimates suggest that setting up barriers would reduce violence, but pacifying groups suffering from grievances would often be more effective.
Funder
Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation
ERC
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference69 articles.
1. ‘A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation’;Anderson;American Economic Review,1979
2. ‘The determinants of low-intensity intergroup violence: the case of Northern Ireland’;Balcells;Journal of Peace Research,2016
3. ‘Transport costs and international trade’;Behar,2011
4. ‘Can hearts and minds be bought? The economics of counterinsurgency in Iraq’;Berman;Journal of Political Economy,2011
5. ‘This mine is mine! How minerals fuel conflicts in Africa’;Berman;American Economic Review,2017
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献