Affiliation:
1. Toulouse School of Economics, University of Toulouse Capitole, France
2. University of Oxford, UK
Abstract
Abstract
We present a novel rationale for bundling in vertical relations. In many markets, upstream firms compete to be in the best downstream slots (e.g., the best shelf in a retail store or the default application on a platform). If a multi-product upstream firm faces competition for a subset of its products, we show that tying the monopolised product with the competitive ones can reduce upstream rivals’ willingness to offer slotting fees to retailers. This strategy does not rely on entry deterrence and can be achieved through contractual or even virtual tying. The model is particularly relevant to the Google-Android case.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference57 articles.
1. Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly;Adams;Quarterly Journal of Economics,1976
2. Tying and freebies in two-sided markets;Amelio;International Journal of Industrial Organization,2012
3. Competitive non-linear pricing and bundling;Armstrong;The Review of Economic Studies,2010
4. Bundling information goods: pricing, profits, and efficiency;Bakos;Management Science,1999
5. Exclusive dealing;Bernheim;Journal of Political Economy,1998
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献