Affiliation:
1. Australian National University Australia
Abstract
Abstract
Rational agents seem more confident in any possible event than in an impossible event. But if rational credences are real-valued, then there are some possible events that are assigned 0 credence nonetheless. How do we differentiate these events from impossible events when we order events? De Finetti (1975), Hájek (2012) and Easwaran (2014) suggest that, when ordering events, conditional credences and subset relations are as relevant as unconditional credences. I present a counterexample to all their proposals in this paper. While their proposals order possible and impossible events correctly, they deliver the wrong verdict for disjoint possible events assigned equal positive credence.
Funder
Australian Government Research Training Program
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference32 articles.
1. Non-archimedean probability;Benci;Milan Journal of Mathematics,2013
2. Infinitesimal probabilities;Benci;British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,2018
3. Non-standard measure theory;Bernstein,1969
4. On mathematical realism and the applicability of hyperreals;Bottazzi;Matematychni Studii,2019
5. Infinite lotteries, spinners, applicability of hyperreals;Bottazzi;Philosophia Mathematica,2021
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献