Abstract
Abstract
On Bernard Suits’s celebrated analysis, to play a game is to engage in a ‘voluntary attempt to overcome unnecessary obstacles’. Voluntariness is understood in terms of the players having the ‘lusory attitude’ of accepting the constitutive rules of the game just because they make possible playing it. In this paper I suggest that the players in Netflix’s hit show Squid Game play the ‘squid games’, but they do not do so voluntarily; they are forced to play. I argue that this means that we should rethink Suits’s analysis by claiming that all that is needed for players to play is that someone has put the rules in force for them for the reason that it makes playing the game possible. I then illustrate the virtues of the revised analysis by showing how it helps us to defuse Hurka’s recent counterexamples to Suits’s view.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference18 articles.
1. Communication and convention;Davidson;Synthese,1984
2. Truth;Dummett;Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society,1959
3. How to understand rule-constituted kinds;Garcia-Carpintero,2022
4. Rules of meaning and practical reasoning;Glüer;Synthese,1999
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Regulative rules: A distinctive normative kind;Philosophy and Phenomenological Research;2023-07-02