“For the first time…I am seriously fighting burnout”: clinician experiences with a challenging electronic health record transition

Author:

Ball Sherry L1ORCID,Rucci Justin M23,Molloy-Paolillo Brianne K4,Cutrona Sarah L45,Brunner Julian6,Mohr David C27,Kim Bo28,Moldestad Megan9ORCID,Zepeda E David27,Orlander Jay D10,Anderson Ekaterina45,Cohen-Bearak Adena4,Helfrich Christian D911,Sayre George911,Rinne Seppo T34

Affiliation:

1. VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System , Cleveland, OH 44106, United States

2. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System , Boston, MA 01730, United States

3. Division of Pulmonary Critical Care, Boston University , Boston, MA 02215, United States

4. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System , Bedford, MA 01730, United States

5. Division of Health Informatics & Implementation Science, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School , Worcester, MA 01655, United States

6. Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System , Los Angeles, CA 90073, United States

7. Boston University School of Public Health , Boston, MA 02215, United States

8. Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA 02115, United States

9. Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VHA Puget Sound Health Care System , Seattle, WA 98108, United States

10. Medical Service, VA Boston Healthcare System, Evans Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine , Boston, MA 02118, United States

11. Department of Health Systems & Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health , Seattle, WA 98195, United States

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is transitioning from its legacy electronic health record (EHR) to a new commercial EHR in a nationwide, rolling-wave transition. We evaluated clinician and staff experiences to identify strategies to improve future EHR rollouts. Materials and Methods We completed a convergent mixed-methods formative evaluation collecting survey and interview data to measure and describe clinician and staff experiences. Survey responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics; interview transcripts were coded using a combination of a priori and emergent codes followed by qualitative content analysis. Qualitative and quantitative findings were compared to provide a more comprehensive understanding of participant experience. Employees of specialty and primary care teams at the first nationwide EHR transition site agreed to participate in our study. We distributed surveys at 1-month pre-transition, 2 months post-transition, and 10 months post-transition to each of the 68 identified team members and completed longitudinal interviews with 30 of these individuals totaling 122 semi-structured interviews. Results Interview participants reported profoundly disruptive experiences during the EHR transition that persisted at 1-year post implementation. Survey responses indicated training difficulties throughout the transition, and sharp declines (P ≤ .05) between pre- and post-go-live measures of EHR usability and increase in EHR burden that were perceived to be due in part to system inefficiencies, discordant positive messaging that initially ignored user challenges, and inadequate support for and attention to ongoing EHR issues. Participants described persistent high levels of stress associated with these disruptions. Discussion Our findings highlight strategies to improve employee experiences during EHR transitions: (1) working with Oracle Cerner to resolve known issues and improve usability; (2) role-based training with opportunities for self-directed learning; (3) peer-led support systems and timely feedback on issues; (4) messaging that responds to challenges and successes; and (5) continuous efforts to support staff with issues and address clinician and staff stress and burnout. Conclusion Our findings provide relevant strategies to navigate future EHR transitions while supporting clinical teams.

Funder

US Department of Veterans Affairs

Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research

Development Quality Enhancement Research Initiative

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3