Development of a text mining algorithm for identifying adverse drug reactions in electronic health records

Author:

van de Burgt Britt W M123ORCID,Wasylewicz Arthur T M2,Dullemond Bjorn4,Jessurun Naomi T5,Grouls Rene J E1,Bouwman R Arthur36,Korsten Erik H M23,Egberts Toine C G78

Affiliation:

1. Division of Clinical Pharmacy, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven , 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands

2. Division Healthcare Intelligence, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven , 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands

3. Department of Electrical Engineering, Signal Processing Group, Technical University Eindhoven , 5612 AP Eindhoven, The Netherlands

4. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University Eindhoven , 5612 AP Eindhoven, The Netherlands

5. Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre LAREB , 5237 MH 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands

6. Department of Anesthesiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven , 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands

7. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Centre Utrecht , 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands

8. Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University , 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Objective Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a significant healthcare concern. They are often documented as free text in electronic health records (EHRs), making them challenging to use in clinical decision support systems (CDSS). The study aimed to develop a text mining algorithm to identify ADRs in free text of Dutch EHRs. Materials and Methods In Phase I, our previously developed CDSS algorithm was recoded and improved upon with the same relatively large dataset of 35 000 notes (Step A), using R to identify possible ADRs with Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terms and the related Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT) (Step B). In Phase II, 6 existing text-mining R-scripts were used to detect and present unique ADRs, and positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity were observed. Results In Phase IA, the recoded algorithm performed better than the previously developed CDSS algorithm, resulting in a PPV of 13% and a sensitivity of 93%. For The sensitivity for serious ADRs was 95%. The algorithm identified 58 additional possible ADRs. In Phase IB, the algorithm achieved a PPV of 10%, a sensitivity of 86%, and an F-measure of 0.18. In Phase II, four R-scripts enhanced the sensitivity and PPV of the algorithm, resulting in a PPV of 70%, a sensitivity of 73%, an F-measure of 0.71, and a 63% sensitivity for serious ADRs. Discussion and Conclusion The recoded Dutch algorithm effectively identifies ADRs from free-text Dutch EHRs using R-scripts and MedDRA/SNOMED-CT. The study details its limitations, highlighting the algorithm's potential and significant improvements.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference46 articles.

1. Pharmacoeconomics of adverse drug reactions;Lundkvist;Fundam Clin Pharmacol,2004

2. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients A meta-analysis of prospective studies;Lazarou;JAMA,1998

3. The burden of repeat prescribing medications after a related adverse drug event;Welk;Healthc Q,2018

4. Repeat adverse drug reactions causing hospitalization in older australians: a population-based longitudinal study 1980-2003;Zhang;Br J Clin Pharmacol,2007

5. Reasons for discontinuation of medication during hospitalization and documentation thereof: a descriptive study of 400 geriatric and internal medicine patients;van der Linden;Arch Intern Med,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3