Research participation preferences as expressed through a patient portal: implications of demographic characteristics

Author:

Obeid Jihad S1ORCID,Shoaibi Azza1,Oates Jim C23,Habrat Melissa L1,Hughes-Halbert Chanita4,Lenert Leslie A1

Affiliation:

1. Biomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA

2. Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

3. Medical Service, Rheumatology Section, Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA

4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveAs patient portals are increasingly used for research recruitment, it is important to examine the demographic makeup of research registries that are populated via portals and the factors that influence participation in these registries.MethodsWe examined the response to a routine research preference questionnaire among patients who were enrolled in a patient portal at an academic health center and characterized the sub-population that responded and was tracked in a research preferences registry. We examined the factors that influence choices in two research preferences: future contact for research opportunities and biobanking of de-identified specimens.ResultsOut of 79 834 patients to whom the questionnaire was sent, 32% responded. Of those 74% agreed to future contact and 77% to the biobank preference. We found significantly lower odds of agreement in both preferences in minority populations, especially in the population >65 years of age when stratified by race. Individuals with higher comorbidity indexes had significantly higher odds for agreement.DiscussionThe disparities in volunteerism as expressed by agreement to future contact and willingness to participate in biobanking are exacerbated by lower levels of enrollment in the patient portal by minorities, especially in the oldest age group. Future work should examine other socioeconomic factors and the differences across age groups, sicker individuals, and payer categories.ConclusionAlthough patient portals can be more efficient for recruitment, researchers have to be cognizant of, and proactively address, potential biases when recruiting participants from these registries.

Funder

NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3