Overcoming gaps: regional collaborative to optimize capacity management and predict length of stay of patients admitted with COVID-19

Author:

Usher Michael G1,Tourani Roshan2,Simon Gyorgy2,Tignanelli Christopher23,Jarabek Bryan4,Strauss Craig E5,Waring Stephen C6,Klyn Niall A M7,Kealey Burke T8,Tambyraja Rabindra9,Pandita Deepti10,Baum Karyn D1

Affiliation:

1. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

2. Department of Medicine, Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

3. Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

4. Department of Informatics, M Health Fairview, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

5. Minneapolis Heart Institute Center for Healthcare Delivery Innovation, Minneapolis Heart Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

6. Essentia Institute of Rural Health, Essential Health, Duluth, Minnesota, USA

7. Information Services, Essentia Health, Duluth, Minnesota, USA

8. Internal Medicine, HealthPartners, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA

9. Children’s Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

10. Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective Ensuring an efficient response to COVID-19 requires a degree of inter-system coordination and capacity management coupled with an accurate assessment of hospital utilization including length of stay (LOS). We aimed to establish optimal practices in inter-system data sharing and LOS modeling to support patient care and regional hospital operations. Materials and Methods We completed a retrospective observational study of patients admitted with COVID-19 followed by 12-week prospective validation, involving 36 hospitals covering the upper Midwest. We developed a method for sharing de-identified patient data across systems for analysis. From this, we compared 3 approaches, generalized linear model (GLM) and random forest (RF), and aggregated system level averages to identify features associated with LOS. We compared model performance by area under the ROC curve (AUROC). Results A total of 2068 patients were included and used for model derivation and 597 patients for validation. LOS overall had a median of 5.0 days and mean of 8.2 days. Consistent predictors of LOS included age, critical illness, oxygen requirement, weight loss, and nursing home admission. In the validation cohort, the RF model (AUROC 0.890) and GLM model (AUROC 0.864) achieved good to excellent prediction of LOS, but only marginally better than system averages in practice. Conclusion Regional sharing of patient data allowed for effective prediction of LOS across systems; however, this only provided marginal improvement over hospital averages at the aggregate level. A federated approach of sharing aggregated system capacity and average LOS will likely allow for effective capacity management at the regional level.

Funder

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3