Is ‘viability’ viable? Abortion, conceptual confusion and the law in England and Wales and the United States
Author:
Romanis Elizabeth Chloe1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Law, Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL
Abstract
Abstract
In this paper, I explore how viability, meaning the ability of the fetus to survive post-delivery, features in the law regulating abortion provision in England and Wales and the USA. I demonstrate that viability is formalized differently in the criminal law in England and Wales and the USA, such that it is quantified and defined differently. I consider how the law might be applied to the examples of artificial womb technology and anencephalic fetuses. I conclude that there is incoherence in the meaning of viability and argue that it is thus a conceptually illegitimate basis on which to ground abortion regulation. This is both because of the fluidity of the concept and because how it has been thus far understood in the law is unsupported by medical realities. Furthermore, it has the effect of heavily diluting pregnant people’s rights with overly moralistic limitations on access to healthcare.
Funder
Wellcome Trust Doctoral Studentship in Society and Ethics
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Law,Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous),Medicine (miscellaneous)
Cited by
50 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Stepping Back;The Edge of Sentience;2024-08-15
2. Large Language Models and the Gaming Problem;The Edge of Sentience;2024-08-15
3. Frontiers of Proportionality;The Edge of Sentience;2024-08-15
4. Pushing the Boundaries;The Edge of Sentience;2024-08-15
5. The Clearest Candidates;The Edge of Sentience;2024-08-15