The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research Task Force on clinical algorithms for fracture risk report

Author:

Burnett-Bowie Sherri-Ann M12,Wright Nicole C34ORCID,Yu Elaine W12,Langsetmo Lisa567,Yearwood Gabby M H8,Crandall Carolyn J910,Leslie William D1112,Cauley Jane A1314

Affiliation:

1. Endocrine Division , Department of Medicine, , Boston, MA 02114, United States

2. Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Department of Medicine, , Boston, MA 02114, United States

3. Department of Epidemiology , School of Public Health, , Birmingham, AL 35233, United States

4. University of Alabama at Birmingham , School of Public Health, , Birmingham, AL 35233, United States

5. Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research , , Minneapolis, MN 55417 , United States

6. Minneapolis VA Health Care Center , , Minneapolis, MN 55417 , United States

7. Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, MN 55455 , United States

8. Department of Anthropology and Center for Civil Rights and Racial Justice, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, PA 15260 , United States

9. Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research , Department of Medicine, , Los Angeles, CA 90095 , United States

10. David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California , Department of Medicine, , Los Angeles, CA 90095 , United States

11. Departments of Internal Medicine and Radiology , Max Rady College of Medicine, , Winnipeg R3E 0T6 , Canada

12. University of Manitoba , Max Rady College of Medicine, , Winnipeg R3E 0T6 , Canada

13. Department of Epidemiology , School of Public Health, , Pittsburgh, PA 15261 , United States

14. University of Pittsburgh , School of Public Health, , Pittsburgh, PA 15261 , United States

Abstract

Abstract Using race and ethnicity in clinical algorithms potentially contributes to health inequities. The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) Professional Practice Committee convened the ASBMR Task Force on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk to determine the impact of race and ethnicity adjustment in the US Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (US-FRAX). The Task Force engaged the University of Minnesota Evidence–based Practice Core to conduct a systematic review investigating the performance of US-FRAX for predicting incident fractures over 10 years in Asian, Black, Hispanic, and White individuals. Six studies from the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) and Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) were eligible; cohorts only included women and were predominantly White (WHI > 80% and SOF > 99%), data were not consistently stratified by race and ethnicity, and when stratified there were far fewer fractures in Black and Hispanic women vs White women rendering area under the curve (AUC) estimates less stable. In the younger WHI cohort (n = 64 739), US-FRAX without bone mineral density (BMD) had limited discrimination for major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) (AUC 0.53 (Black), 0.57 (Hispanic), and 0.57 (White)); somewhat better discrimination for hip fracture in White women only (AUC 0.54 (Black), 0.53 (Hispanic), and 0.66 (White)). In a subset of the older WHI cohort (n = 23 918), US-FRAX without BMD overestimated MOF. The Task Force concluded that there is little justification for estimating fracture risk while incorporating race and ethnicity adjustments and recommends that fracture prediction models not include race or ethnicity adjustment but instead be population-based and reflective of US demographics, and inclusive of key clinical, behavioral, and social determinants (where applicable). Research cohorts should be representative vis-à-vis race, ethnicity, gender, and age. There should be standardized collection of race and ethnicity; collection of social determinants of health to investigate impact on fracture risk; and measurement of fracture rates and BMD in cohorts inclusive of those historically underrepresented in osteoporosis research.

Funder

Board of Trustees for the Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation

Amgen, Inc

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3