Do Patients with Acute Low Back Pain in Emergency Departments Have More Severe Symptoms than Those in General Practice? ASystematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Author:

Oliveira Crystian B123ORCID,Hamilton Melanie3ORCID,Traeger Adrian34,Buchbinder Rachelle56,Richards Bethan37,Rogan Eileen8,Maher Chris G34,Machado Gustavo C34

Affiliation:

1. Physical Therapy Department, Faculty of Science and Technology, Sao Paulo State University, Presidente Prudente, Sao Paulo, Brazil

2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Western São Paulo (UNOESTE), Presidente Prudente, Sao Paulo, Brazil

3. Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

4. School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

5. Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

6. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

7. Rheumatology Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

8. Emergency Department, Canterbury Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Introduction There is a common belief that patients presenting to emergency departments have more severe pain levels and functional limitations than those who are seen in general practice. The aim of this systematic review was to compare pain and disability levels of patients with acute low back pain presenting to general practice vs those presenting to emergency departments. Methods Electronic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL from database inception to February 2019. Observational studies including patients with acute non-specific low back pain presenting to emergency departments and/or general practice were eligible. Pain and/or disability scores expressed on a 0–100 scale were the primary outcomes. Risk of bias was evaluated with a validated tool for observational studies, and the overall quality of evidence was assessed with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Meta-analysis with random effects and meta-regression were used to test for differences between the two settings. Results We included 12 records reporting results for 10 unique studies with a total of 6,999 participants from general practice (n = 6) and emergency departments (n = 4). There was low-quality evidence (downgraded for indirectness and inconsistency) that patients presenting to emergency departments had higher pain scores than those in general practice, with a mean difference of 17.3 points (95% confidence interval: 8.8 to 25.9 on a 0–100 scale). Similarly, there was low-quality evidence (downgraded for indirectness and inconsistency) that patients presenting to emergency departments had higher disability scores than those in general practice (mean difference: 21.7; 95% confidence interval: 4.6 to 38.7 on a 0–100 scale). Conclusion Patients with acute non-specific low back pain presenting to emergency departments may report higher levels of pain and disability than those seen in general practice.

Funder

São Paulo Research Foundation

National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Early Career Fellowship

Australian NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellowship

NHMRC Principal Research Fellowship and NHMRC Program

NHMRC Early Career Fellowship

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Clinical Neurology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3