Psychological Factors Are Associated with Pain at All Time Frames After Breast Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses

Author:

Moloney Niamh A12,Pocovi Natasha C1,Dylke Elizabeth S3,Graham Petra L4,De Groef An56ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia

2. THRIVE Physiotherapy, Guernsey, Channel Islands

3. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia

4. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Centre for Economic Impacts of Genomic Medicine (GenIMPACT), Macquarie Business School, and Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia

5. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven—University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

6. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Abstract

Abstract Objective This systematic review aimed to 1) assess associations between psychological factors and pain after breast cancer (BC) treatment and 2) determine which preoperative psychological factors predicted pain in the acute, subacute, and chronic time frames after BC surgery. Design A systematic review with meta-analysis. Subjects Women with early-stage BC. Methods The Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases were searched between 1990 and January 2019. Studies that evaluated psychological factors and pain after surgery for early-stage BC were included. Associations between psychological factors and pain, from early after surgery to >12 months after surgery, were extracted. Effect size correlations (r equivalents) were calculated and pooled by using random-effects meta-analysis models. Results Of 4,137 studies, 47 were included (n = 15,987 participants; 26 studies ≤12 months after surgery and 22 studies >12 months after surgery). The majority of the studies had low to moderate risk of bias. Higher preoperative anxiety and depression were weak but significant predictors of pain at all time points up to 12 months (r equivalent: 0.15–0.22). Higher preoperative pain catastrophizing and distress were also weak but significant predictors of pain during the acute (0–7 days) and chronic (3–12 months) periods (r equivalent: 0.10–0.20). For the period >12 months after surgery, weak but significant cross-sectional associations with pain were identified for anxiety, depression, pain catastrophizing, and distress (r equivalents: 0.15, 0.17, 0.25, 0.14, respectively). Conclusion Significant pooled effect size correlations between psychological factors and pain were identified across all time frames. Though weak, these associations should encourage assessment of key psychological factors during preoperative screening and pain assessments at all postoperative time frames.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Neurology (clinical),General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3