Enhancing behavioral intervention science: using community-based participatory research principles with the multiphase optimization strategy

Author:

Windsor Liliane Cambraia1ORCID,Benoit Ellen2,Pinto Rogério M3,Gwadz Marya4,Thompson Warren5

Affiliation:

1. School of Social Work, The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA

2. North Jersey Community Research Initiative, Newark, NJ 07103, USA

3. The University of Michigan, School of Social Work, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

4. Silver School of Social Work, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA

5. Department of Social Work, Rutgers: The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ 07102, USA

Abstract

Abstract Innovative methodological frameworks are needed in intervention science to increase efficiency, potency, and community adoption of behavioral health interventions, as it currently takes 17 years and millions of dollars to test and disseminate interventions. The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) for developing behavioral interventions was designed to optimize efficiency, efficacy, and sustainability, while community-based participatory research (CBPR) engages community members in all research steps. Classical approaches for developing behavioral interventions include testing against control interventions in randomized controlled trials. MOST adds an optimization phase to assess performance of individual intervention components and their interactions on outcomes. This information is used to engineer interventions that meet specific optimization criteria focused on effectiveness, cost, or time. Combining CBPR and MOST facilitates development of behavioral interventions that effectively address complex health challenges, are acceptable to communities, and sustainable by maximizing resources, building community capacity and acceptance. Herein, we present a case study to illustrate the value of combining MOST and CBPR to optimize a multilevel intervention for reducing substance misuse among formerly incarcerated men, for under $250 per person. This integration merged experiential and cutting-edge scientific knowledge and methods, built community capacity, and promoted the development of efficient interventions. Integrating CBPR and MOST principles yielded a framework of intervention development/testing that is more efficient, faster, cheaper, and rigorous than traditional stage models. Combining MOST and CBPR addressed significant intervention science gaps and speeds up testing and implementation of interventions.

Funder

National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Applied Psychology

Reference21 articles.

1. Dissemination and implementation science for public health professionals: an overview and call to action;Estabrooks;Prev Chronic Dis.,2018

2. No easy answers: avoiding potential pitfalls of de-implementation;Pinto;Am J Community Psychol.,2019

3. Critical issues in developing and following community-based participatory research principles.;Israel,2008

4. Strategies of community engagement in research: definitions and classifications;Thompson;Transl Behav Med.,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3