Affiliation:
1. Department of Philosophy (Zhuhai), Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China
Abstract
Abstract
This paper develops a deontic logic for defeasible permission and studies norm change in various updated semantics. When one grants that $\varphi $ or $\psi $ is permitted, normally, it goes together with the conjunction of a permission of $\varphi $ and that of $\psi $. In the monotonic reasoning on this permission, a permission of $\varphi $ leads to a permission of $\varphi $ and $\psi $; however, if a prohibition of $\psi $ is introduced, we get into trouble. We face a paradox of free choice permission. Many solutions have been proposed, but a systematic account of handling norm change is still needed. This paper first introduces the notion of normality to develop a sound and complete deontic logic for defeasible permission, which can be used to analyse several notions in natural language and in game theory. Further, following Lewis’ idea of norm change, a systematic way to capture various dynamics for updating permission and obligation is proposed.
Funder
National Social Science Fund of China
Convergence Research Project for Brain Research and Artificial Intelligence, Zhejiang University
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Logic,Hardware and Architecture,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Software,Theoretical Computer Science
Reference100 articles.
1. Quantified coalition logic;Agotnes;Synthese,2008
2. Open reading without free choice;Anglberger,2014
3. Obligation, free choice, and the logic of weakest permissions;Anglberger;The Review of Symbolic Logic,2015
4. Free choice permission is strong permission;Asher;Synthese,2005
5. A dynamic logic for privacy compliance;Aucher;Artificial Intelligence and Law,2011