Benchmarking computational methods for B-cell receptor reconstruction from single-cell RNA-seq data

Author:

Andreani Tommaso1ORCID,Slot Linda M2ORCID,Gabillard Samuel3,Strübing Carsten4,Reimertz Claus4,Yaligara Veeranagouda5,Bakker Aleida M2,Olfati-Saber Reza6,Toes René E M2,Scherer Hans U2ORCID,Augé Franck7,Šimaitė Deimantė1

Affiliation:

1. AI & Deep Analytics—Omics Data Science, Sanofi , Frankfurt am Main 65926, Germany

2. Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center , 2333 RC Leiden, The Netherlands

3. Life & Soft , Le Plessis-Robinson, Paris 92260, France

4. Immunology & Inflammation Research, Sanofi , Frankfurt am Main 65926, Germany

5. Molecular Biology & Genomics, Translational Science Unit, Sanofi , Chilly-Mazarin  91385, France

6. AI & Deep Analytics, Sanofi , Cambridge, MA 02142, USA

7. AI & Deep Analytics—Omics Data Science, Sanofi , Paris 91385, France

Abstract

AbstractMultiple methods have recently been developed to reconstruct full-length B-cell receptors (BCRs) from single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. This need emerged from the expansion of scRNA-seq techniques, the increasing interest in antibody-based drug development and the importance of BCR repertoire changes in cancer and autoimmune disease progression. However, a comprehensive assessment of performance-influencing factors such as the sequencing depth, read length or number of somatic hypermutations (SHMs) as well as guidance regarding the choice of methodology is still lacking. In this work, we evaluated the ability of six available methods to reconstruct full-length BCRs using one simulated and three experimental SMART-seq datasets. In addition, we validated that the BCRs assembled in silico recognize their intended targets when expressed as monoclonal antibodies. We observed that methods such as BALDR, BASIC and BRACER showed the best overall performance across the tested datasets and conditions, whereas only BASIC demonstrated acceptable results on very short read libraries. Furthermore, the de novo assembly-based methods BRACER and BALDR were the most accurate in reconstructing BCRs harboring different degrees of SHMs in the variable domain, while TRUST4, MiXCR and BASIC were the fastest. Finally, we propose guidelines to select the best method based on the given data characteristics.

Funder

Innovative Medicines Initiative

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Applied Mathematics,Computer Science Applications,Genetics,Molecular Biology,Structural Biology

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3