Listening to and Believing Derogatory and Threatening Voices

Author:

Sheaves Bryony12,Johns Louise12,Loe Bao S3,Bold Emily12,Černis Emma12,Molodynski Andrew12,Freeman Daniel12,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford , Oxford , UK

2. Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust , Oxford , UK

3. The Psychometrics Centre, University of Cambridge , Cambridge , UK

Abstract

Abstract Background and hypothesis A plausible cause of distress for voice hearers is listening to and believing the threats and criticisms heard. Qualitative research indicates that patients have understandable reasons to listen. This study aimed to develop the understanding of distress using this listening and believing framework. Measures were developed of listening and believing voices and the reasons, and associations with distress tested. Study design A cross-sectional study of patients hearing derogatory and threatening voices (N = 591). Listening and Believing–Assessment and Listening and Believing–Reasons item pools were completed, and assessments of distress. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and structural equation modeling (SEM) were conducted. Study results 52% (n = 307) of participants believed their voices most or all the time. Listening and believing had 4 factors: active listening, passive listening, believing, and disregarding. Higher levels of believing, active listening, and particularly passive listening were associated with higher levels of anxiety, depression, and voice distress. Reasons for listening and believing formed 7 factors: to better understand the threat; being too worn down to resist; to learn something insightful; being alone with time to listen; voices trying to capture attention; voices sounding like real people; and voices sounding like known people. Each type of reason was associated with active listening, passive listening, and believing. SEM showed that feeling worn down in particular accounted for listening and believing. Test–retest reliability of measures was excellent. Conclusions A framework of listening and believing negative voices has the potential to inform the understanding and treatment of voice distress.

Funder

Higher Education England

National Institute for Health and Care Research

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference38 articles.

1. The omnipotence of voices: a cognitive approach to auditory hallucinations;Chadwick;Br J Psychiatry.,1994

2. The revised beliefs about voices questionnaire (BAVQ-R);Chadwick;Br J Psychiatry.,2000

3. The relationship between appraisals of voices (auditory verbal hallucinations) and distress in voice-hearers with schizophrenia-spectrum diagnoses: a meta-analytic review;Tsang;Schizophr Res.,2021

4. Cognitive behaviour therapy to prevent harmful compliance with command hallucinations (COMMAND): a randomised controlled trial;Birchwood;Lancet Psychiatry.,2014

5. AVATAR therapy for auditory verbal hallucinations in people with psychosis: a single-blind, randomised controlled trial;Craig;Lancet Psychiatry.,2018

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3