Cognitive Remediation Works But How Should We Provide It? An Adaptive Randomized Controlled Trial of Delivery Methods Using a Patient Nominated Recovery Outcome in First-Episode Participants

Author:

Wykes Til12ORCID,Stringer Dominic1,Boadu Janette1,Tinch-Taylor Rose1,Csipke Emese1,Cella Matteo12ORCID,Pickles Andrew1,McCrone Paul3,Reeder Clare1,Birchwood Max4,Fowler David5,Greenwood Kathryn5,Johnson Sonia6,Perez Jesus7,Ritunnano Rosa4,Thompson Andrew4,Upthegrove Rachel8,Wilson Jon9,Kenny Alex10,Isok Iris10,Joyce Eileen M11

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London , London , UK

2. South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK

3. School of Health Sciences, University of Greenwich , London , UK

4. Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick , Coventry , UK

5. School of Psychology, University of Sussex , Brighton , UK

6. Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London , London , UK

7. Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust , Cambridge , UK

8. School of Psychology, University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK

9. Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust , Norwich , UK

10. Patient Advisory Board, King’s College London , London , UK

11. UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London , London , UK

Abstract

Abstract Background and Hypothesis Cognitive remediation (CR) benefits cognition and functioning in psychosis but we do not know the optimal level of therapist contact, so we evaluated the potential benefits of different CR modes. Study Design A multi-arm, multi-center, single-blinded, adaptive trial of therapist-supported CR. Participants from 11 NHS early intervention psychosis services were independently randomized to Independent, Group, One-to-One, or Treatment-as-usual (TAU). The primary outcome was functional recovery (Goal Attainment Scale [GAS]) at 15-weeks post randomization. Independent and TAU arms were closed after an interim analysis, and three informative contrasts tested (Group vs One-to-One, Independent vs TAU, Group + One-to-One vs TAU). Health economic analyses considered the cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY). All analyses used intention-to-treat principles. Study Results We analyzed 377 participants (65 Independent, 134 Group, 112 One-to-One, 66 TAU). GAS did not differ for Group vs One-to-One: Cohen’s d: 0.07, −0.25 to 0.40 95% CI, P = .655; Independent vs TAU: Cohen’s d: 0.07, −0.41 to 0.55 95% CI, P = .777. GAS and the cognitive score improved for Group + One-to-One vs TAU favoring CR (GAS: Cohen’s d: 0.57, 0.19–0.96 95% CI, P = .003; Cognitive score: Cohens d: 0.28, 0.07–0.48 95% CI, P = .008). The QALY costs were £4306 for Group vs TAU and £3170 for One-to-One vs TAU. Adverse events did not differ between treatment methods and no serious adverse events were related to treatment. Conclusions Both active therapist methods provided cost-effective treatment benefiting functional recovery in early psychosis and should be adopted within services. Some individuals benefited more than others so needs further investigation. Trial registration ISRCTN14678860 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN14678860Now closed.

Funder

Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London

National Institute for Health Research

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3