Increased Belief Instability in Psychotic Disorders Predicts Treatment Response to Metacognitive Training

Author:

Hauke D J12ORCID,Roth V2,Karvelis P3,Adams R A45ORCID,Moritz S6,Borgwardt S78,Diaconescu A O39,Andreou C78

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry (UPK), University of Basel , Basel , Switzerland

2. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Basel , Basel , Switzerland

3. Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) , Toronto , Canada

4. Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London , London , UK

5. Max Planck Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London , London , United Kingdom

6. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE) , Hamburg , Germany

7. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Translational Psychiatry Unit, University of Lübeck , Lübeck , Germany

8. Center of Brain, Behaviour and Metabolism, University of Lübeck , Lübeck , Germany

9. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada

Abstract

AbstractBackground and HypothesisIn a complex world, gathering information and adjusting our beliefs about the world is of paramount importance. The literature suggests that patients with psychotic disorders display a tendency to draw early conclusions based on limited evidence, referred to as the jumping-to-conclusions bias, but few studies have examined the computational mechanisms underlying this and related belief-updating biases. Here, we employ a computational approach to understand the relationship between jumping-to-conclusions, psychotic disorders, and delusions.Study DesignWe modeled probabilistic reasoning of 261 patients with psychotic disorders and 56 healthy controls during an information sampling task—the fish task—with the Hierarchical Gaussian Filter. Subsequently, we examined the clinical utility of this computational approach by testing whether computational parameters, obtained from fitting the model to each individual’s behavior, could predict treatment response to Metacognitive Training using machine learning.Study ResultsWe observed differences in probabilistic reasoning between patients with psychotic disorders and healthy controls, participants with and without jumping-to-conclusions bias, but not between patients with low and high current delusions. The computational analysis suggested that belief instability was increased in patients with psychotic disorders. Jumping-to-conclusions was associated with both increased belief instability and greater prior uncertainty. Lastly, belief instability predicted treatment response to Metacognitive Training at the individual level.ConclusionsOur results point towards increased belief instability as a key computational mechanism underlying probabilistic reasoning in psychotic disorders. We provide a proof-of-concept that this computational approach may be useful to help identify suitable treatments for individual patients with psychotic disorders.

Funder

Brain & Behavior Research Foundation

German Research Foundation

Federal Ministry of Education and Research

Swiss National Science Foundation

Krembil Foundation

Medical Research Council

National Institute for Health Research

Centre for Medical Image Computing

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3