Antipsychotic Dose in Acute Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis

Author:

Takeuchi Hiroyoshi12,MacKenzie Nicole E23,Samaroo Dominic24,Agid Ofer256,Remington Gary2567,Leucht Stefan8

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

2. Schizophrenia Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada

3. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada

4. Brain and Spine Institute, ICM, Sorbonne University, Paris, France

5. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

6. Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

7. Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada

8. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Little is known regarding optimal antipsychotic doses in the acute phase of schizophrenia. The aim of the present study was to employ the concept of minimum effective dose (MED) in examining efficacy and tolerability within this population. MED was identified for each antipsychotic through a previous systematic review. We then identified double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trials that involved fixed-dose antipsychotic monotherapy in acute schizophrenia and compared the identified MED vs higher doses of the same oral antipsychotic. Studies were selected from a recent meta-analysis examining dose–response relationship of second-generation antipsychotics and haloperidol. We extracted the data on study discontinuation, psychopathology, extrapyramidal symptoms, and treatment-emergent adverse events. For each antipsychotic, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare outcomes between MED and 2-fold MED, and MED and 3-fold MED. A total of 26 studies involving 5618 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In terms of study discontinuation, significant differences were found in study discontinuation due to lack of efficacy between MED and higher doses, in favor of 2-fold and 3-fold MEDs. Regarding psychopathology, both 2-fold and 3-fold MEDs were superior to MED for total and positive symptom scores. As for side effects, 2-fold MED proved inferior to MED for parkinsonism scores and diarrhea, whereas 3-fold MED was inferior for akathisia, somnolence, and vomiting. Findings suggest that clinicians can dose an antipsychotic at 2-fold or 3-fold MED for patients with acute schizophrenia but should closely monitor side effects.

Funder

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development

SENSHIN Medical Research Foundation

Novartis Pharma

Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Japanese Society of Clinical Neuropsychopharmacology

Kyowa

Janssen

Meiji Seika Pharma

Mochida

Otsuka

Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma

Yoshitomiyakuhin

Acadia

Boehringer Ingelheim

DiaMentis

Janssen-Ortho

Neurocrine Biosciences

Syneurx

HLS Therapeutics

Research Hospital Fund–Canada Foundation for Innovation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Cited by 26 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3