Current practice of pharmacological treatment for hyperactive delirium in terminally ill cancer patients: results of a nationwide survey of Japanese palliative care physicians and liaison psychiatrists

Author:

Matsuda Yoshinobu1ORCID,Morita Tatsuya2,Oya Kiyofumi3,Tagami Keita4ORCID,Naito Akemi Shirado5,Kashiwagi Hideyuki6,Otani Hiroyuki78

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychosomatic Internal Medicine, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center , Sakai , Japan

2. Department of Palliative and Supportive Care, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital , Hamamatsu , Japan

3. Peace Home Care Clinic , Otsu , Japan

4. Department of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine , Sendai , Japan

5. Department of Palliative Care, Miyazaki Medical Association Hospital , Miyazaki , Japan

6. Department of Transitional and Palliative Care, Aso Iizuka Hospital , Iizuka , Japan

7. Department of Palliative and Supportive Care, Palliative Care Team, National Kyushu Cancer Center , Fukuoka , Japan

8. Department of Palliative and Supportive Care, Palliative Care Team , St. Mary’s Hospital, Kurume , Japan

Abstract

Abstract Objective The objective of this survey was to identify areas where doctors have divergent practices in pharmacological treatment for hyperactive delirium in terminally ill patients with cancer. Methods We conducted a survey of Japanese palliative care physicians and liaison psychiatrists. Inquiries were made regarding: (i) choice of drug class in the first-line treatment, (ii) administration methods of the first-line antipsychotic treatment, (iii) starting dose of antipsychotics in the first line treatment and maximum dose of antipsychotics in refractory delirium, and (iv) choice of treatment when the first-line haloperidol treatment failed. Respondents used a five-point Likert scale. Results Regarding choice of drug class in the first-line treatment, more doctors reported that they ‘frequently’ or ‘very frequently’ use antipsychotics only than antipsychotics and benzodiazepine (oral: 73.4 vs. 12.2%; injection: 61.3 vs. 11.6%, respectively). Regarding administration methods of the first-line antipsychotic treatment, the percentage of doctors who reported that they used antipsychotics as needed and around the clock were 55.4 and 68.8% (oral), 49.2 and 45.4% (injection), respectively. There were different opinions on the maximum dose of antipsychotics in refractory delirium. Regarding the choice of treatment when the first-line haloperidol treatment failed, the percentage of doctors who reported that they increased the dose of haloperidol, used haloperidol and benzodiazepines, and switched to chlorpromazine were 47.0, 32.1 and 16.4%, respectively. Conclusions Doctors have divergent practices in administration methods of the first-line antipsychotic treatment, maximum dose of antipsychotics, and choice of treatment when the first-line haloperidol treatment failed. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal treatment.

Funder

MEXT

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology,General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3