Rapid on-site evaluation of touch imprints of biopsies improves the diagnostic yield of transbronchial biopsy for endoscopically nonvisible malignancy: a retrospective study

Author:

Wang Hansheng1,Ren Tao1,Wang Xiao1,Wei Na1,Luo Guoshi1,Li Dan2,Chen Qin1,You Hui1,Wang Jiankun1,Wang Meifang13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, P. R. China

2. Department of Pathology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, P. R. China

3. Hubei Key Laboratory of Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, P. R. China

Abstract

Abstract Objective Rapid on-site evaluation has long been used for transbronchial needle aspiration or fine-needle aspiration to evaluate the adequacy of biopsy materials for the diagnosis of peripheral lung lesions. However, research on rapid on-site evaluation combined with transbronchial forceps biopsy in the diagnosis of lung carcinoma is rarely reported. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the value of rapid on-site evaluation during transbronchial forceps biopsy for endoscopically visible (tumor, infiltrative and necrotic) or nonvisible (compressive, nonspecific and normal) malignancy. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed between January 2015 and January 2019 in Taihe Hospital with 1216 lung cancer patients who underwent bronchoscopy procedures, and these patients were allocated into the rapid on-site evaluation group and non-rapid on-site evaluation group, depending on the timing of the procedure. According to endoscopic features, bronchoscopic appearance was described as endoscopically visible malignancy (tumor, infiltrative and necrotic) and endoscopically nonvisible malignancy (compressive, nonspecific and normal). The diagnostic yield was compared, and the concordance between the rapid on-site evaluation results and the final histology was analyzed. Results There was a statistically significant difference in the diagnostic yield between the rapid on-site evaluation and non-rapid on-site evaluation groups for endoscopically nonvisible malignancy (74.3% vs. 51.7%, P < 0.05). However, we found no significant improvement in terms of diagnostic yield for endoscopically visible malignancy (95.2% vs. 91.2%, P > 0.05). The rapid on-site evaluation results showed high-level concordance with histology in the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma and small cell carcinoma, with kappa values of 0.749 (P < 0.05), 0.728 (P < 0.05) and 0.940 (P < 0.05), respectively. Conclusions The findings demonstrated that the diagnostic yield of transbronchial biopsy for endoscopically nonvisible malignancy (compressive, nonspecific and normal) was significantly improved when rapid on-site evaluation was implemented. In addition, the rapid on-site evaluation results had high-level concordance with the final histological diagnosis.

Funder

Educational Commission of Hubei Province

Hubei Provincial Department of Education

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology,General Medicine

Reference39 articles.

1. Bronchoscopy for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer;El-Bayoumi;Semin Respir Crit Care Med,2008

2. Cryobiopsy increases the diagnostic yield of endobronchial biopsy: a multicentre trial;Hetzel;Eur Respir J,2012

3. Cryobiopsy: should this be used in place of endobronchial forceps biopsies?;Rubio;Biomed Res Int,2013

4. Performance characteristics of different modalities for diagnosis of suspected lung cancer: summary of published evidence;Schreiber;Chest,2003

5. Liquid-based cytological test of samples obtained by catheter aspiration is applicable for the bronchoscopic confirmation of pulmonary malignant tumors;Li;Int J Clin Exp Pathol,2014

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3