Challenges needed to be overcome in multi-institutional surgical trials: accumulated experience in the JCOG Colorectal Cancer Study Group (CCSG)

Author:

Kataoka Kozo12ORCID,Fujita Shin3,Inomata Masafumi4,Takii Yasumasa5,Ohue Masayuki6ORCID,Shiozawa Manabu7,Akagi Tomonori4,Ikeda Masataka1,Tsukamoto Shunsuke8,Tsukada Yuichiro9,Ito Masaaki9,Ikeda Satoshi10,Ueno Hideki11ORCID,Shida Dai12,Kanemitsu Yukihide8

Affiliation:

1. Division of lower GI, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan

2. International Trials Management Section, Clinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

3. Department of Surgery, Tochigi Cancer Center, Tochigi, Japan

4. Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Hospital, Oita, Japan

5. Department of Surgery, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan

6. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan

7. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan

8. Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

9. Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan

10. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan

11. Department of Surgery, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan

12. Division of Frontier Surgery, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Abstract

Abstract JCOG-CCSG has been conducting several surgical trials and experienced several challenges. The first point is the appropriate timing of conducting the trial. Once a certain number of surgeons acquire the new technique and its utility is accepted, it suddenly becomes difficult to maintain ‘equipoise’ between the standard and new treatment, which may lead to poor patient accrual. Smooth preparation and commencement of the trial at an appropriate timing is necessary for its success. Second is the appropriate quality assurance of surgery. High-level quality assurance will strengthen the comparability of randomized control trials and minimize the heterogeneity among hospitals. On the other hand, it may impair the generalizability of the trial. Large observational studies help to bridge the gap of heterogeneity among hospitals. Third is the selection of an appropriate endpoint. Overall survival (OS) is the gold-standard primary endpoint; however, the number of events is much less due to more effective treatment. JCOG0212 and JCOG0404 were unable to demonstrate the non-inferiority of omission of lateral lymph node dissection and laparoscopic surgery partly due to a lack of power. Disease-free survival (DFS) is also a promising candidate for primary endpoint, but as in JCOG0603, special attention must be paid when DFS does not correlate with OS. Although careful discussion is required because the precision of the hazard ratio depends on the number of events, an alternative population-level summary of variables, including restricted mean survival time, can be considered as the primary endpoint. Future surgical trials should be planned considering these points.

Funder

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3