Oncological and prognostic analysis of soft tissue sarcoma of the elbow: report using the bone and soft tissue tumor registry in Japan

Author:

Emori Makoto1ORCID,Iba Kousuke1,Murahashi Yasutaka1,Shimizu Junya1,Sonoda Tomoko2,Wada Takuro3,Yamashita Toshihiko1,Kawai Akira4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

2. Department of Public Health, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hokkaido Saiseikai Otaru Hospital, Otaru, Hokkaido, Japan

4. Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Abstract

Abstract Objective Soft tissue sarcomas in the elbow are extremely rare, and they have primarily been described in case series. Definitive concerning the prevalence and prognostic factors of elbow soft tissue sarcomas remain unknown. We examined the outcome of patients with elbow soft tissue sarcomas and identified the relevant prognostic factors. Methods In total, 219 patients with elbow soft tissue sarcomas were identified using data from the bone and soft tissue tumor registry in Japan. Differences in demographics, disease characteristics, treatment and survival were compared among the patients. Survival analyses including local recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method with log-rank tests and the Cox proportional hazards model. Results Two hundred nineteen patients with elbow soft tissue sarcomas were identified, including 119 males (54.3%) and 100 females (45.7%). In total, 189 patients (86.3%) underwent surgery including re-excision. Of the surgically treated patients, 180 (95.2%) underwent limb salvage surgery, and nine patients (4.8%) underwent amputation. The 5-year overall survival, local recurrence-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival rates for the entire patient cohort were 76.3, 70.1, and 69.3%, respectively. After adjusting for clinically relevant factors, overall survival was significantly worse among patients with tumors: >10 cm (hazard ratio = 4.34; 95% confidence interval = 1.03–18.2) and metastatic disease (hazard ratio = 6.94; 95% confidence interval = 1.55–31.0). Conclusions Tumor size was identified as an independent risk factor for poor prognosis.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology,General Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3