A multicentre retrospective study comparing site-specific treatment with empiric treatment for unfavourable subset of cancer of unknown primary site

Author:

Nishikawa Kazuo1ORCID,Hironaka Shuichi1ORCID,Inagaki Takashi1,Komori Azusa1,Otsu Satoshi1,Mitsugi Kenji2,Makiyama Akitaka3,Watanabe Koichiro4,Tamura Shingo56,Okumura Yuta7,Kusaba Hitoshi89,Esaki Taito10,Baba Eishi1112,Shirao Kuniaki1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine , Yufu , Japan

2. Department of Medical Oncology, Hamanomachi Hospital , Fukuoka , Japan

3. Department of Hematology/Oncology, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Kyushu Hospital , Kitakyushu , Japan

4. Department of Medical Oncology, Oitaken Koseiren Tsurumi Hospital , Beppu , Japan

5. Department of Medical Oncology , Clinical Research Institute, , Fukuoka , Japan

6. National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center , Clinical Research Institute, , Fukuoka , Japan

7. Department of Internal medicine, Kyushu University Beppu Hospital , Beppu , Japan

8. Department of Hematology , Oncology & Cardiovascular medicine, , Fukuoka , Japan

9. Kyushu University Hospital , Oncology & Cardiovascular medicine, , Fukuoka , Japan

10. Department of Gastrointestinal and Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center , Fukuoka , Japan

11. Department of Oncology and Social Medicine , Graduate School of Medical Sciences, , Fukuoka , Japan

12. Kyushu University , Graduate School of Medical Sciences, , Fukuoka , Japan

Abstract

Abstract Background Patients with cancer of unknown primary site are divided into two distinct groups, favourable and unfavourable subsets. For the unfavourable subset, empiric treatment or site-specific treatment is recommended, but limited knowledge exists about the efficacy of site-specific treatment compared with empiric treatment in clinical practice. Methods In this multicentre retrospective study, we reviewed the medical records of patients with cancer of unknown primary site treated with chemotherapy (or chemoradiotherapy) as first-line treatment from eight institutions during 2006–18. We investigated the workup modality and categorized the patients into favourable and unfavourable subsets, which were further divided into site-specific and empiric treatment groups. Site-specific treatment is defined as a standard chemotherapy for an estimated primary site. We examined the efficacy in the favourable and unfavourable subsets and performed multivariable analysis for estimating the overall survival in the unfavourable subset. Results Of 177 patients with cancer of unknown primary site, 33 and 144 were categorized into favourable and unfavourable subsets, respectively. In the unfavourable subset, 84 patients (58.3%) received empiric therapy, and 60 patients (41.7%) received site-specific treatment. Median overall survival was 10.0 and 10.1 months in site-specific and empiric treatment groups, respectively, with no significant difference (hazard ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.70–1.45, P = 0.95). Multivariable analysis revealed performance status, number of metastatic sites and hypoalbuminaemia as independent prognostic factors for overall survival in the unfavourable subset. Conclusions Overall survival in site-specific and empiric treatment groups was similar in the unfavourable cancer of unknown primary site subset in this study. Further research is needed to prolong overall survival in patients in the unfavourable cancer of unknown primary site subset.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3