A BMI-category distribution pattern of intrinsic and treatment-related prognostic factors in endometrial cancer

Author:

Kurosu Hiroyuki1ORCID,Todo Yukiharu1,Yamada Ryutaro1,Minowa Kaoru1,Tsuruta Tomohiko1,Minobe Shinichiro1,Kato Hidenori1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, National Hospital Organization, Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan

Abstract

Abstract Objective In patients with endometrial cancer, obesity is associated with favorable prognostic characteristics but not with prolonged survival. The aim of this study was to elucidate the reason for this clinical paradox. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 1173 patients with endometrial cancer. Patients were divided into a non-obese group [body mass index (BMI) < 30 kg/m2], class I obesity group (BMI 30–35 kg/m2) and class II obesity group (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2). The relationship between clinicopathological factors and disease-specific survival (DSS) was analyzed by Cox regression analysis. To correct for three-time significance testing, we used the Bonferroni method, giving the level of probability at which findings were considered significant as P < 0.0167. Results Three disease-intrinsic variables—older age, advanced stage and high-risk histology—and three treatment-related variables—no hysterectomy, no lymphadenectomy and no chemotherapy—were independently associated with poor DSS. DSS was similar among the three groups of patients even though the proportion of patients with plural pretreatment-related unfavorable risk factors significantly decreased with increment of BMI category (40.1 vs. 27.5 vs. 17.6%, P = 0.0003). The proportion of patients with plural treatment-related unfavorable prognostic factors significantly increased with increment of BMI category (21.3 vs. 26.7 vs. 39.3%, P = 0.0072). Conclusions Poor-quality surgical staging in obese women may result in worse than expected survival outcomes.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3