Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on periosteal osteosarcoma: a systematic review

Author:

Tsukamoto Shinji1ORCID,Righi Alberto2,Kido Akira3ORCID,Honoki Kanya1,Tanaka Yuu4,Fujii Hiromasa1,Mavrogenis Andreas F5,Tanaka Yasuhito1,Errani Costantino6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nara Medical University , Nara, Japan

2. Department of Pathology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli , Bologna, Italy

3. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nara Medical University , Nara, Japan

4. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Wakayama Professional University of Rehabilitation , Wakayama, Japan

5. First Department of Orthopaedics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens , School of Medicine, Athens, Greece

6. Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli , Bologna, Italy

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objective The effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on periosteal osteosarcoma are controversial. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of studies comparing mortality, local recurrence, distant metastasis and secondary malignancy incidence among patients who underwent surgery and (neo-) adjuvant chemotherapy or surgery alone for periosteal osteosarcoma without distant metastases at diagnosis. Methods Of the 210 studies identified in the search, 13 were included in this study, involving 291 patients with periosteal osteosarcoma in total. Results The mortality rates in the surgery and (neo-) adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery alone groups were 11.3% (8/71) and 16.3% (16/98), respectively. The overall pooled odds ratio was 0.89 (P = 0.800). The local recurrence rate in the surgery and (neo-) adjuvant chemotherapy group was 12.1% (8/66), while that in the surgery alone group was 17.6% (13/74). The overall pooled odds ratio was 1.31 (P = 0.601). The distant metastasis rate in the surgery and (neo-) adjuvant chemotherapy group was 15.2% (10/66) and that in the surgery alone group was 10.8% (8/74). The overall pooled odds ratio was 1.51 (P = 0.444). The incidence of secondary malignancy in the surgery and (neo-) adjuvant chemotherapy group was 7.6% (9/118) and that in the surgery alone group was 2.7% (2/74). The overall pooled odds ratio was 2.29 (P = 0.187). Conclusions Adjuvant chemotherapy did not appear to improve the prognosis of patients with periosteal osteosarcoma. No association was found between the use of adjuvant chemotherapy and development of secondary malignancies.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology,General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. Periosteal osteogenic sarcoma;Unni;Cancer,1976

2. Periosteal osteosarcoma. Review of 41 Cases, 22 with long-term follow-up;Campanacci;Ital J Orthop Traumatol,1976

3. MDM2 and CDK4 expression in periosteal osteosarcoma;Righi;Hum Pathol,2015

4. Periosteal osteosarcoma: a single-institutional study of factors related to oncologic outcomes;Chan;Sarcoma,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3