Affiliation:
1. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rutgers–New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ
2. Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, Rutgers–New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ
Abstract
Abstract
Background
YouTube is increasingly being utilized as a major educational resource by patients. It is important for plastic surgeons to understand the quality and characteristics of videos that patients are likely to view about procedures of interest.
Objectives
The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of the videos that patients are most likely to encounter when searching YouTube for the most common cosmetic plastic surgery procedures.
Methods
Based on Google Trends data, the most searched medical and colloquial terms were identified for common cosmetic surgery procedures: “abdominoplasty,” “tummy tuck,” “breast augmentation,” “boob job,” “liposuction,” “lipo,” “mastopexy,” “breast lift,” “reduction mammoplasty,” and “breast reduction.” On YouTube, videos were searched by relevance (default) and view count; the top 10 results were collected in each group and rated according to the DISCERN criteria. Each video was assigned an overall and bias DISCERN score (DS). A score of 1 indicates high bias and low overall quality and a score of 5 indicates the opposite.
Results
In total, 143 unique videos were identified, which resulted in a mean bias DS of 2.29 and mean overall DS of 2.44. Seventy-two videos included US board-certified plastic surgeons and 58 were classified as patient experience. Videos had 667,373,209 total views and were an average of 4.27 years old. Videos including US board-certified plastic surgeons were of significantly higher quality and showed lower bias than videos without these practitioners (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
Overall, YouTube videos showed high bias and low quality. Plastic surgeons should be aware of this popular resource and counsel patients about the bias that is often present. Plastic surgeons and academic plastic surgery organizations should strive to upload high-quality, unbiased videos to provide patients with a more appropriate resource.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献