Endometriosis biomarkers: Will codevelopment in academia–industry partnerships result in new and robust noninvasive diagnostic tests?

Author:

M D’Hooghe Thomas123ORCID,Fassbender Amelie14,F O Dorien2,Vanhie Arne25

Affiliation:

1. Global Medical Affairs Fertility, R&D Biopharma, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

2. Department of Development and Regeneration, Biomedical Sciences Group, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Leuven, Belgium

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University, New Haven, USA

4. Medical Affairs, R&D Biopharma, Merck KGaA, Brussels, Belgium

5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Abstract

Abstract Endometriosis is an important gynecological disease, affecting 10% of reproductive age women, and associated with pain, infertility, reduced quality of life, and high health economic cost. Except for ultrasound detection of ovarian endometriotic cysts, the gold standard for diagnosis is laparoscopy, leading to diagnostic delays of 5–10 years. Accurate noninvasive biomarkers are needed, especially for symptomatic women with a normal gynecological ultrasound, to triage them towards medical or surgical treatment and to monitor their treatment outcome. Such biomarkers are not available today, largely because the research focus has been on discovery, not on reproducibility and validation. Academia/industry partnerships can move this field forward by validation of promising markers, consensus on endometriosis phenotypes/controls and desirable accuracy (sensitivity/specificity). Such partnerships should increase the quality and reproducibility of target discovery work and foster global consensus on the use of relevant preclinical/animal models, if they are managed with complete (financial) transparency and with the aim to translate innovation into products benefiting patients. It is essential that mutual objectives are clarified between industry and academia partners including intellectual property policy, critical decision points, funding agreements, milestones and timelines, with a clear strategy for project termination/change of strategy, a restriction on publications till new discoveries have been patented, considering that a minority of novel findings can be translated into new therapeutic targets, diagnostics, or marketed products.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cell Biology,General Medicine,Reproductive Medicine

Reference36 articles.

1. Industry is not the dark side, but an essential partner to make progress in reproductive health;D’Hooghe;Womens Health (Lond),2016

2. Transparent collaboration between industry and academia can serve unmet patient need and contribute to reproductive public health;D’Hooghe;Hum Reprod,2017

3. Epidemiology of endometriosis;Eskenazi;Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am,1997

4. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis;Dunselman;Hum Reprod,2014

5. Endometriosis fertility index: the new, validated endometriosis staging system;Adamson;Fertil Steril,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3