Affiliation:
1. Department of Economics, University of California, Davis
Abstract
Abstract
Safe asset shortages can expose an economy to liquidity traps. The nature of these traps is determined by the cyclicality of the bond premium. A counter-cyclical bond premium opens the possibility of expectations-driven liquidity traps in which small issuances of government debt crowd out private debt and reduce output. In contrast, when the bond premium is pro-cyclical and the economy is in a liquidity trap, government debt is expansionary. In the data, we find evidence of a counter-cyclical bond premium. Large interventions can prevent the emergence of self-fulfilling traps, but they require sufficient fiscal capacity. In a quantitative model calibrated to the Great Recession, a promise to increase the government debt-to-GDP ratio by 20 percentage points precludes the possibility of self-fulfilling traps.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference72 articles.
1. The Side Effects of Safe Asset Creation;Acharya;Journal of the European Economic Association,2022
2. Trend Inflation and Firms Price-Setting: Rotemberg versus Calvo;Ascari;The Economic Journal,2012
3. Monetary Policy for a Bubbly World;Asriyan;The Review of Economic Studies,2020
4. Modeling and Measuring Organization Capital;Atkeson;Journal of Political Economy,2005
5. Money and Capital in a Persistent Liquidity Trap;Bacchetta;Journal of Monetary Economics,2020
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献