Affiliation:
1. Harvard Kennedy School and NBER
2. Betterfly
3. London School of Economics and CEPR
4. University of Sussex
Abstract
Abstract
This article tests for bias in consumer lending using administrative data from a high-cost lender in the U.K. We motivate our analysis using a new principal-agent model of bias where loan examiners are incentivized to maximize a short-term outcome, not long-term profits, leading to bias against illiquid applicants at the margin of loan decisions. We identify the profitability of marginal applicants using the quasi-random assignment of loan examiners, finding significant bias against immigrant and older applicants when using the firm’s preferred measure of long-run profits but not when using the short-run measure used to evaluate examiner performance. In this case, market incentives based on characteristics that vary across groups lead to inefficient group-based bias.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference66 articles.
1. Loan Prospecting and the Loss of Soft Information;AGARWAL;Journal of Financial Economics,2018
2. Payday Loans and Credit Cards: New Liquidity and Credit Scoring Puzzles?;AGARWAL;American Economic Review,2009
3. Do Women Pay More for Credit? Evidence from Italy;ALESINA;Journal of the European Economic Association,2013
4. ExtrapoLATE-ing: External Validity and Overidentification in the LATE Framework;ANGRIST;Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Volume 3, Econometrics: Tenth World Congress,2013
5. Racial Bias in Bail Decisions;ARNOLD;Quarterly Journal of Economics,2018
Cited by
36 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献