Affiliation:
1. Princeton University and NBER
2. University of Texas at Austin
3. Princeton University, CUHK Shenzhen and NBER
Abstract
Abstract
China’s economic model involves regular and intensive government interventions in financial markets, while Western policymakers often refrain from substantial interventions outside crisis periods. We develop a theoretical framework to rationalize the approaches of both China and the West to managing the financial system as being optimal given the differences in their respective economies. In this framework, a government leans against trading of noise traders but at the expense of introducing policy noise to the market. Our welfare analysis shows that under certain underlying economic conditions, the optimal government policy induces a government-centric equilibrium, in which government intervention is so intensive that all investors choose to acquire private information about policy noise rather than fundamentals. This policy regime characterizes China’s approach with financial stability prioritized over other policy objectives.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference56 articles.
1. Beauty Contests and Iterated Expectations in Asset Markets;ALLEN,;Review of Financial Studies,2006
2. The Development of the Chinese Stock Market;ALLEN,,2020
3. Monetary Policy Expectations, Fund Managers, and Fund Returns: Evidence from China;AMMER,,2020
4. The Handbook of China's Financial System
5. Signaling in a Global Game: Coordination and Policy Traps;ANGELETOS,;Journal of Political Economy,2006
Cited by
54 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献