We Are All Behavioural, More, or Less: A Taxonomy of Consumer Decision-Making

Author:

Stango Victor1,Zinman Jonathan2

Affiliation:

1. UC Davis Graduate School of Management

2. Dartmouth College , IPA, J-PAL, and NBER

Abstract

Abstract We examine how 17 behavioural biases relate to each other, to three standard measures of risk and time preferences, to cognitive skills, personality, and demographics, and to outcomes in household finance, well-being, and health. Most consumers in our nationally representative panel data exhibit multiple biases, with substantial cross-person heterogeneity. Biases are positively correlated within person, especially after adjusting for measurement error. From that correlation structure, we reduce our 20 bias and standard preference measures to four behavioural common factors. Each BCF reflects a group of related biases regarding beliefs, decision quality, discounting, or risk/uncertainty attitudes. The first two BCFs also strongly correlate with each other (positively) and cognitive skills (negatively). The first three BCFs and cognitive skills strongly correlate with various outcomes in the expected directions. Our results support processing-based models where basic limitations in cognition and/or attention produce multiple biases, and they have several other implications for theory and practice.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Economics and Econometrics

Reference96 articles.

1. What Do Consumers Consider Before They Choose? Identification from Asymmetric Demand Responses;ABALUCK,;The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2021

2. When Less Is More: Improving Choices in Health Insurance Markets;ABALUCK,;The Review of Economic Studies,2022

3. Exponential Growth Bias and Financial Literacy;ALMENBERG,;Applied Economics Letters,2012

4. Estimating Time Preferences from Convex Budgets;ANDREONI,;The American Economic Review,2012

5. Stability and Change of Personality Traits, Self-Esteem, and Well-Being: Introducing the Meta-analytic Stability and Change Model of Retest Correlations;ANUSIC,;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2016

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3